Xiaomi Hybrid IEM Thread (Piston successor)
post-12164166
Post #362 of 856

ClieOS

IEM Reviewer Extraordinaire
Joined
May 11, 2004
Messages
19,620
Reaction score
8,675
Location
Middle of Johor, Malaysia
Joined
May 11, 2004
Location
Middle of Johor, Malaysia
Posts
19,620
Likes
8,675
Website
InEarMatters.net
nvm.
 
     Share This Post       
post-12164376
Post #364 of 856

urbach

New Head-Fier
Joined
Aug 22, 2008
Messages
22
Reaction score
19
Joined
Aug 22, 2008
Posts
22
Likes
19
But I mean hybrid not a piston 3

http://m.gearbest.com/earphones/pp_265759.html?admitad_uid=197169445ae28c4b685b021378103ecd
 
yes buddy, mine a hybrid from gearbest. look at the pictures. total diff from any piston.
 
     Share This Post       
post-12164437
Post #365 of 856

lesp4ul

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Sep 16, 2014
Messages
277
Reaction score
58
Joined
Sep 16, 2014
Posts
277
Likes
58


Just received this dude today, quite impressive for the price, warm, clean, good separation. The only minus thing ootb is the bass if a bit too much :D

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
 
     Share This Post       
post-12164587
Post #366 of 856

ezekiel77

Reviewer at Headphonesty
Joined
Jun 16, 2015
Messages
4,276
Reaction score
3,894
Location
Malaysiurrr
Joined
Jun 16, 2015
Location
Malaysiurrr
Posts
4,276
Likes
3,894
Website
headphonesty.com
Just received this dude today, quite impressive for the price, warm, clean, good separation. The only minus thing ootb is the bass if a bit too much


Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
 
If you believe in burn-in, top of the page Twin noted that 218 hours burning in will improve this baby.
 
     Share This Post       
post-12164745
Post #367 of 856

DaveLT

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Aug 23, 2015
Messages
929
Reaction score
101
Joined
Aug 23, 2015
Posts
929
Likes
101
     Share This Post       
post-12164795
Post #368 of 856

urbach

New Head-Fier
Joined
Aug 22, 2008
Messages
22
Reaction score
19
Joined
Aug 22, 2008
Posts
22
Likes
19
  Anybody know about this?
http://www.head-fi.org/products/1more-multi-unit-earphones
 
 
  That's NOT their version of the Hybrid and secondly ... 1More designs, Xiaomi manufactures when it comes to the xiaomi brand.
 
My bad. I was refering to Nuke142 thread. Its pointed to 1More hybrid, which i have in hand now.
 
     Share This Post       
post-12165614
Post #369 of 856

Igor Eisberg

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Sep 4, 2015
Messages
239
Reaction score
44
Joined
Sep 4, 2015
Posts
239
Likes
44
  Naming
As this product is not officially available in the global market, there is no official english name. The chinese name is "小米圈铁耳机" which would translate to Xiaomi Hybrid IEM.
 
The correction you were provided with is wrong.
I'd like to make something clear here, since there is too much confusion over the name of these earphones.
 
The Chinese name "小米活塞" is pronounced "Xiǎomǐ huósāi" and translates to "Xiaomi Piston". The original transliteration was "Xiaomi Huosai", and now you know why.
The Chinese name "小米圈铁" is pronounced "Xiǎomǐ quān tiě" and translates to "Xiaomi Iron Ring". The original transliteration was "Xiaomi Quantie", and now you also know why.
 
Conclusion:
It's "Huosai" in Chinese, and "Piston" in English. It's "Quantie" in Chinese, and "Iron Ring" in English.
"Hybrid" is the marketing name for the dual-driver technology they used with the Iron Ring. This has nothing to do with the name of the earphones.
 
Please rename the thread's title accordingly.
 
     Share This Post       
post-12165644
Post #370 of 856

bhazard

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jul 15, 2013
Messages
3,622
Reaction score
1,817
Joined
Jul 15, 2013
Posts
3,622
Likes
1,817
   
The correction you were provided with is wrong.
I'd like to make something clear here, since there is too much confusion over the name of these earphones.
 
The Chinese name "小米活塞" is pronounced "Xiǎomǐ huósāi" and translates to "Xiaomi Piston". The original transliteration was "Xiaomi Huosai", and now you know why.
The Chinese name "小米圈铁" is pronounced "Xiǎomǐ quān tiě" and translates to "Xiaomi Iron Ring". The original transliteration was "Xiaomi Quantie", and now you also know why.
 
Conclusion:
It's "Huosai" in Chinese, and "Piston" in English. It's "Quantie" in Chinese, and "Iron Ring" in English.
"Hybrid" is the marketing name for the dual-driver technology they used with the Iron Ring. This has nothing to do with the name of the earphones.
 
Please rename the thread's title accordingly.
It uses a balanced armature and a dynamic driver, aka it's a hybrid. "Iron Ring" is actually another term/translation for armature, just like "moving coil" = dynamic driver. To call it an Iron Ring would be misleading. Op doesn't need to rename anything.
 
     Share This Post       
post-12165656
Post #371 of 856

Igor Eisberg

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Sep 4, 2015
Messages
239
Reaction score
44
Joined
Sep 4, 2015
Posts
239
Likes
44
  It uses a balanced armature and a dynamic driver, aka it's a hybrid. "Iron Ring" is actually another term/translation for armature, just like "moving coil" = dynamic driver. To call it an Iron Ring would be misleading. Op doesn't need to rename anything.

Yet, in no way does it translate to "Hybrid", that what's misleading. "Hybrid" is the marketing name for the tech, that's a fact.
 
     Share This Post       
post-12165678
Post #372 of 856

bhazard

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jul 15, 2013
Messages
3,622
Reaction score
1,817
Joined
Jul 15, 2013
Posts
3,622
Likes
1,817
 
Yet, in no way does it translate to "Hybrid", that what's misleading. "Hybrid" is marketing name for the tech, that's a fact.
I didn't say anything about the word hybrid translating. I said Iron Ring is a rough translation for Armature, which has been used frequently in the past by many companies in their descriptions. Since this isn't an Armature only earphone, calling it the "Iron Ring" is misleading. You'd have to call it the Xiaomi Iron Ring/Moving Coil, which sounds awful when you can just say hybrid, which is a well known and established term for a dynamic driver/armature combo earphone.
 
"Piston 2.1" was never official either, yet it helped determine different versions of the earphone people were receiving.
 
     Share This Post       
post-12165710
Post #373 of 856

Igor Eisberg

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Sep 4, 2015
Messages
239
Reaction score
44
Joined
Sep 4, 2015
Posts
239
Likes
44
  I didn't say anything about the word hybrid translating. I said Iron Ring is a rough translation for Armature, which has been used frequently in the past by many companies in their descriptions. Since this isn't an Armature only earphone, calling it the "Iron Ring" is misleading. You'd have to call it the Xiaomi Iron Ring/Moving Coil, which sounds awful when you can just say hybrid, which is a well known and established term for a dynamic driver/armature combo earphone.
 
"Piston 2.1" was never official either, yet it helped determine different versions of the earphone people were receiving.

I disagree. The Chinese use:
"动圈(单元)" (translates to "Moving coil (unit)") for a dynamic driver unit.
"动铁(单元)" (translates to "Iron (unit)") for a balanced armature.
 
http://www.1more.com/product/show-218.html

 
"圈铁" means exactly that, an Iron Ring. And I don't think it has anything to do with the driver units, I think they refer to the large "ring" you see externally on the housing.
 
     Share This Post       
post-12165713
Post #374 of 856

dabotsonline

Head-Fier
Joined
Jul 23, 2014
Messages
55
Reaction score
19
Joined
Jul 23, 2014
Posts
55
Likes
19
The official spec page - http://www.mi.com/quantie/specs/ - states that the Model Number of 小米圈铁耳机 is QTER01JY, yet the SKU on the packaging in the review by Chongdiantou's ccctao shows a SKU of ZBW4298CN: http://www.chongdiantou.com/thread-6784-1-1.html

Also, here's a review by Eric Chan of Engadget China: http://cn.engadget.com/2015/12/15/xiaomi-quantie-earphone-hands-on/
 
     Share This Post       
post-12165735
Post #375 of 856

Igor Eisberg

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Sep 4, 2015
Messages
239
Reaction score
44
Joined
Sep 4, 2015
Posts
239
Likes
44
The main issue with calling them "Hybrid" is that they are not the first hybrids to be made by Xiaomi and 1MORE (an audio device company established by three former Foxconn executives thanks to the investment of Xiaomi):
http://www.xiaomitoday.com/premium-quality-xiaomi-headphones-launches-for-31/
The last paragraph states "The value for this is amazing, considering the next competitor, the Iron Ring Hi-Fi headsets cost way more than what this pair of headphones are currently priced at."
 
http://www.1more.com/en/acoustics_list.htm
That "1MORE Multi-Unit" is the first "Hybrid" by 1MORE, Iron Ring is the second (they are also made by 1MORE to be branded as Xiaomi).
You can see that some Pistons are under the 1MORE brand (while others were branded as Xiaomi, but made by 1MORE nonetheless, because Xiaomi doesn't make audio equipment themselves, 1MORE does that for them)

"Hybrid"/"Multi-Unit" on left, "Iron Ring" on right.
 
Another evidence:
http://www.1more.com/product/show-218.html
The text "1MORE多单元圈铁耳机" translates to "1MORE Multi-Unit Iron Ring Earphones". Saying that it's "1MORE Multi-Unit Hybrid Earphones" makes no sense. (Multi-Unit = Hybrid).
 
Conclusion:
Both earphones use the Hybrid dual-driver technology, both are called "Iron Ring", the first one is 1MORE Iron Ring, the other is Xiaomi Iron Ring.
 
Hope I made my point.
 
* It is entirely possible that "Xiaomi Piston Iron" is the correct translation, because "ring" may refer to a "piston ring", even though the word "piston" isn't in the original Chinese name. The source is this official Xiaomi Czech store:
http://xiaomi-store.cz/cs/sluchatka-a-handsfree/119-xiaomi-piston-iron-6954176846044.html
 
* In Russia it's called just "Xiaomi Quantie":
http://store-xiaomi.ru/garnitura-xiaomi-quantie
 
     Share This Post       

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top