A pair of bose i tried on the store. i dont remember their name but they're not noise cancelling and they sound like complete crap. I took the headphones off after 15 seconds of use. Yes, thats how bad they are.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
WORST headphone you ever heard?
DefQon
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2011
- Posts
- 7,068
- Likes
- 147
QC15's probably.
formula1
fabio-fi, jackwess and formula1 are all the same person.
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2011
- Posts
- 628
- Likes
- 18
ATH-M20. Anemic bass, boring sound signature
Saleri
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2012
- Posts
- 62
- Likes
- 13
QC 15 offers some of the best sound cancellation out there and offer good sound quality. So why don't you like them?
QC15's probably.
ssrock64
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2011
- Posts
- 4,168
- Likes
- 257
Quote:
The poster above mentioned specifically that they weren't noise-cancelling, so that rules out the QCs.
I'd bet it's the AE, though the OE is even worse.
QC15's probably.
The poster above mentioned specifically that they weren't noise-cancelling, so that rules out the QCs.
I'd bet it's the AE, though the OE is even worse.
Smugsie
Previously known as Nec3
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2013
- Posts
- 1,713
- Likes
- 588
Bose AE2i
Didn't like em, sure they were noise cancelling. But they were so laid back, it felt like I was at the back of an auditorium.
Didn't like em, sure they were noise cancelling. But they were so laid back, it felt like I was at the back of an auditorium.
MellonCollie
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2012
- Posts
- 139
- Likes
- 14
This seems like the place to post this.
Skullcandy just released the skullcrushers 2.0
They will replace the old skullcrushers and be the NEW #1 worst headphone for $100
Skullcandy admitted themselves the skullcrushers sucked
Skullcandy just released the skullcrushers 2.0
They will replace the old skullcrushers and be the NEW #1 worst headphone for $100
Skullcandy admitted themselves the skullcrushers sucked
lebomb
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- May 7, 2010
- Posts
- 266
- Likes
- 14
Quote:
LOL seriously??? Anyhow, they are now call Skullcandy "crushers" and surprisingly they have gotten pretty decent reviews. So they cannot be the worst headphones period.
This seems like the place to post this.
Skullcandy just released the skullcrushers 2.0
They will replace the old skullcrushers and be the NEW #1 worst headphone for $100
Skullcandy admitted themselves the skullcrushers sucked
LOL seriously??? Anyhow, they are now call Skullcandy "crushers" and surprisingly they have gotten pretty decent reviews. So they cannot be the worst headphones period.
ssrock64
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2011
- Posts
- 4,168
- Likes
- 257
Quote:
The poster specifically mentioned that they're the worst under $100, not the worst overall. It didn't fit the thread, but it wasn't an outright exaggeration.
LOL seriously??? Anyhow, they are now call Skullcandy "crushers" and surprisingly they have gotten pretty decent reviews. So they cannot be the worst headphones period.
The poster specifically mentioned that they're the worst under $100, not the worst overall. It didn't fit the thread, but it wasn't an outright exaggeration.
Zasteba
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2012
- Posts
- 29
- Likes
- 0
I bought a $20 pair of cans for gaming once a few years back before I got into the audiophile thing. I went back to them recently and had the compulsion to make them violently explode.
blueangel2323
Headphoneus Supremus
Quote:
That's probably a common if not universal experience on here. The other day I listened to some of my old junk that was in the drawer because they were the only earbuds I had left. I've just sold all my IEMs that were worthy of sale because I ordered my first custom IEMs (which I haven't received yet).
The first was a pair of "Cora" clamshell things that hooked onto your ears. I use them back in high school almost 10 years ago. The midrange was surprisingly clear, but there was no bass or treble to speak of.
Then it got worse. I put on a set of Sony IEMs that I was still using up until 3 years ago. It was one of the lowest end models, like an EX9 or something. Wow, I could not believe I actually used to listen to them. The midrange was so recessed it was pretty much absent. Nothing but flabby, booming midbass. It makes me shudder to think that my pair before that was the Skullcandy Ink'd, which were even boomier and muddier. What was wrong with me? lol
I bought a $20 pair of cans for gaming once a few years back before I got into the audiophile thing. I went back to them recently and had the compulsion to make them violently explode.
That's probably a common if not universal experience on here. The other day I listened to some of my old junk that was in the drawer because they were the only earbuds I had left. I've just sold all my IEMs that were worthy of sale because I ordered my first custom IEMs (which I haven't received yet).
The first was a pair of "Cora" clamshell things that hooked onto your ears. I use them back in high school almost 10 years ago. The midrange was surprisingly clear, but there was no bass or treble to speak of.
Then it got worse. I put on a set of Sony IEMs that I was still using up until 3 years ago. It was one of the lowest end models, like an EX9 or something. Wow, I could not believe I actually used to listen to them. The midrange was so recessed it was pretty much absent. Nothing but flabby, booming midbass. It makes me shudder to think that my pair before that was the Skullcandy Ink'd, which were even boomier and muddier. What was wrong with me? lol
Bose Triport
Father in law had some and loved them and I listened to them for about 10 sec and couldn't do it beyond that point. My $20 Senn HD201 sounded so much better than those. Maybe they were defective but wow it was bad!
Father in law had some and loved them and I listened to them for about 10 sec and couldn't do it beyond that point. My $20 Senn HD201 sounded so much better than those. Maybe they were defective but wow it was bad!
MellonCollie
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2012
- Posts
- 139
- Likes
- 14
The poster specifically mentioned that they're the worst under $100, not the worst overall. It didn't fit the thread, but it wasn't an outright exaggeration.
I heard theyre worse than the aviators but they are actually trying to make everything work.
I'm still skeptical, they shouldve just thrown this idea down the garbage. I dont think buzzes and vibrations will ever really work, atleast they say it wont sound like crap when you turn off the "subwoofer"
inasafeplace
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2007
- Posts
- 369
- Likes
- 22
Beats
AKG K81DJ
United Airlines headphones (LOL)
AKG K81DJ
United Airlines headphones (LOL)
MellonCollie
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2012
- Posts
- 139
- Likes
- 14
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUynmhH-gGA
This is the only review hating on them.
The comment section makes me C/_/___R...inge
its funny, maybe these 13y/o kids are right. Fake bass is to be enjoyed by everyone or you get essay long death threats
This is the only review hating on them.
The comment section makes me C/_/___R...inge
its funny, maybe these 13y/o kids are right. Fake bass is to be enjoyed by everyone or you get essay long death threats
Users who are viewing this thread
Total: 5 (members: 0, guests: 5)