Thesonofkrypton
500+ Head-Fier
What is it about the sound of the CFW that you disliked?
Couldn't pinpoint it but it def doesn't sound like the m100 - it was lacking perhaps the quality of the bass or just something was missing...
What is it about the sound of the CFW that you disliked?
The wireless sounds muddy in comparison to the m100 IMO.Couldn't pinpoint it but it def doesn't sound like the m100 - it was lacking perhaps the quality of the bass or just something was missing...
Quote:Couldn't pinpoint it but it def doesn't sound like the m100 - it was lacking perhaps the quality of the bass or just something was missing...
Originally Posted by dcfac73 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
The wireless sounds muddy in comparison to the m100 IMO.
maybe I shouldve said darker indstead of muddy. The highs seem to be more rolled off on the cfw, but the mids are more prominent.Hmm....to me the Wireless leans closer towards tonal balance than the M100 (but that's not to say the Wireless is completely tonally balanced), but I didn't find the Wireless to be muddy.
Yeah if they can offer the m100 sound in wireless mode that would be pretty amazing. Not holding my breath though.
They are pretty dang close. Seriously.
Close but not close enough for my ears, that's why I stick with the m-100 now and have sold the wireless. Having no wires is great, but at the end, I prefer to have the m100 sound signature and the collapsibility of the m100 design.
Oh, don't get me wrong, I 100% agree...I use my regular M100s way more often because of the portability advantages. The sound, wired, sounds almost identical...so if you're using them wired, M100 all the way.
I have the wireless on loan now and I have a chance to buy them cheap with XL pads but I was reluctant because they don't sound the same to me as the M100, which I heard before sometime back. You have both right and they sound indistinguishable wired?