TRN impressions thread
Dec 6, 2019 at 7:02 PM Post #1,667 of 3,805
Dec 6, 2019 at 9:40 PM Post #1,668 of 3,805
A lot, at least https://www.head-fi.org/showcase/trn-ba5.24047/reviews

They are all on point in their own way imo.

Thanks for the link.
Those reviews make them seem really really good.
The price is right, and they look like a 1970's Lamborgini Countach or a stealth fighter, so that's COOL!!!
But let me ask you. I just got a pair of KZ AS10's They're also a 5 BA per side setup.
If you've tried them, how do they compare with the TRN BA5's ?
Thanks :)
 
Dec 7, 2019 at 12:04 AM Post #1,669 of 3,805
Thanks for the link.
Those reviews make them seem really really good.
The price is right, and they look like a 1970's Lamborgini Countach or a stealth fighter, so that's COOL!!!
But let me ask you. I just got a pair of KZ AS10's They're also a 5 BA per side setup.
If you've tried them, how do they compare with the TRN BA5's ?
Thanks :)

I have not compared, but I've had a few KZ hybrids (only kept the ZS7) and the BA5 balanced armatures sound more natural timbre wise than the KZs, I hear no metallic tone on acoustic instruments.

On some classical music it still slightly unnatural at times, but it's not a 400$ all knowles set so I forgive it :)
 
Dec 7, 2019 at 5:44 AM Post #1,671 of 3,805
Thanks for the link.
Those reviews make them seem really really good.
The price is right, and they look like a 1970's Lamborgini Countach or a stealth fighter, so that's COOL!!!
But let me ask you. I just got a pair of KZ AS10's They're also a 5 BA per side setup.
If you've tried them, how do they compare with the TRN BA5's ?
Thanks :)

Clearly better tonality. Signature is different but clearly more controlled. Comparing to A10, it's better too. I prefer the approach of ba5.

But I have the high frequency ba which are not functional since yesterday. It seems the welding which is defective. I'll see with a colleague to open it
 
Dec 7, 2019 at 3:05 PM Post #1,673 of 3,805
I want to buy trn st1 but worry it sound terrible with that strange freq resp. Looking for a review but cannot find anything. And its not that cheap around $13 converted at lazada.

Most of us who have taken a punt on ST1 are yet to receive them, hence you can't find any reviews or impressions.
 
Dec 7, 2019 at 5:33 PM Post #1,678 of 3,805
Finally i recieved BA5... very nice build quality, excellent shape that blends with my ear cavity. OOTB they sound V-shaped and are just plain bright, exactly as they are measuring - 3 peaks one after another with 8K-9k being mostl annoying for ears. After extensive tip rolling i came back to stock TRN tips included in package - L version being most pleasant full sounding to me. SpiralDots were the worst (to my surpise). Stock cable has 1.9 Ohm resistance (0.95 ohm is negative wire + 0.95 is positive wire), given that impedance from specs is around 20 ohm these sound quite bad with stock cable. SQ is much better with higher quality low resistance cable like Tripowin C8 SIlver Copper which has combined resistance under 0.9 Ohm.
For those that also find it bright these can be modded very easily. Lift off the metallic dust cap and put inside some acoustic foam (or animal sponge courtesy of @DynamicEars ) this will tame high freq intensity while preserving overal tuning shape. Other idea for further modding that i will try tomorrow should be opening of the faceplate and desolder one (or mabe even two) of the 30095 high-freq BA units, thus lowering brightness without puting sponge into nozzle.
78996866_2514275602123123_6426298151820328960_n.png
78836226_1208623919340996_843278461626744832_n.jpg
78602827_611489532918720_8984905363702677504_n.jpg
79752243_995955720758610_211761502808440832_n.jpg
78401413_2556574234623237_413738224008036352_n.jpg
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top