Mar 27, 2007 at 4:31 PM Post #2,866 of 5,942
Quote:

Originally Posted by Zoide /img/forum/go_quote.gif
And I'm here at the airport laughing like an idiot at my laptop. People must think I'm crazy
3000smile.gif



Hihi, someone should have made a picture of you and have it posted here
icon10.gif
 
Mar 27, 2007 at 4:38 PM Post #2,867 of 5,942
Quote:

Originally Posted by Contrastique /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Hihi, someone should have made a picture of you and have it posted here
icon10.gif



Baby why not posting a pic of you instead!!!...
wink.gif
wink.gif
wink.gif
 
Mar 27, 2007 at 4:41 PM Post #2,868 of 5,942
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sovkiller /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Baby why not posting a pic of you instead!!!...
wink.gif
wink.gif
wink.gif



If you dig deep enough, you will find a couple
wink.gif
 
Mar 27, 2007 at 5:15 PM Post #2,869 of 5,942
Quote:

Originally Posted by analog'd /img/forum/go_quote.gif
yup, definitely informed by the motivation to sell.



you come off as adament here as you do in all your bombastic postings on the glories of singlepower amps. i say bombastic because for months and months anytime anyone asked about anything to do with an amp you just had to jump in with the fan-boy babbling despite it having nothing to do with the op's question or the general bent of the thread. now that is what i call nonsense.

just because you don't have the ears to hear something doesn't mean its the emporer's new bow-tie.

anyway, i am very sorry to see your limited vision has invaded this thread, and even sorrier to see that some very nice folks are allowing you to bait them, as others have elsewhere. but i am sure they will also learn to ignore you, as others have elsewhere.

cheers mate.



Seems to me you are the one attempting to bait someone.

Well guess what, I have opinions and I am allowed to express them. I guess you dont have any because all you care to do is lodge personal attacks. You paint a very distorted picture, again to discredit, but your bully mentality and insults will not make me change my opinion. I find it sad because I dont agree with your rah rah mentality over a headphone you fell the need to lash out. But do I really care? No I dont .... that reflection is of your foolishness; not mine.

I will go on record to say my personal opinion is that the Akg 701 or Alessandro MS2 or Senn 580/600 are superior sounding headphones compared to the Ultrasone 2500. As more people buy Ultrasones they will either agree or disagree. But once enough people get them in their hands so that any negative opinion of the 2500 cant be stamped out I suspect the Ultrasone FOTM will end quickly.

Cheers mate
 
Mar 27, 2007 at 8:11 PM Post #2,871 of 5,942
Quote:

Originally Posted by sacd lover /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Seems to me you are the one attempting to bait someone.


ahh, the age-old question: who's zoomin who?

in any case, sorry you felt bullied.

also: my apologies to all on this thread who rightly felt i was fanning the flames instead of pursuing peace among us humans. i was fanning the flames. i let my annoyance get the best of me. my bad... i will not repeat my transgressions...
 
Mar 28, 2007 at 1:23 AM Post #2,872 of 5,942
Everyone,

I've added all the easy-to-find head-fier's reviews to the review list, going back to 2001! Check it out! Please give me (via PM perhaps, or here) any posts that are hidden in here or elsewhere that sum-up to being review types of posts embedded inside of another thread. All the ones I've listed are the more "formal review" types of threads that start out with the first post as the review.
http://www.head-fi.org/forums/showpo...postcount=2826

Enjoy!

Terry
750prolinebx3.png
 
Mar 28, 2007 at 5:27 AM Post #2,873 of 5,942
funny everyone start mentioning brothers in arms. That was my first S-logic moment for music
smily_headphones1.gif
 
Mar 28, 2007 at 6:25 AM Post #2,875 of 5,942
Quote:

Originally Posted by tbritton /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I've added all the easy-to-find head-fier's reviews to the review list, going back to 2001! Check it out! Please give me (via PM perhaps, or here) any posts that are hidden in here or elsewhere that sum-up to being review types of posts embedded inside of another thread. All the ones I've listed are the more "formal review" types of threads that start out with the first post as the review.
http://www.head-fi.org/forums/showpo...postcount=2826



Fantastic (if not, somewhat disturbingly obsessive
wink.gif
) work on that reviews list there, Terry!

Thanks!
smily_headphones1.gif
 
Mar 28, 2007 at 7:00 AM Post #2,876 of 5,942
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dexdexter /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Fantastic (if not, somewhat disturbingly obsessive
wink.gif
) work on that reviews list there, Terry!

Thanks!
smily_headphones1.gif



Heh... well, it required that I be a little obsessive to get to the end of it, that is certain! But it was also fun, and like a discovery adventure. I kept just knowing that another one was in there somewhere! But now the most tedious part is finished, and I can obsess on grouping the models sometime... but don't hold your breath!

I thought of marking them "good" or "bad" reviews, that is, pro or con, but most of them are too complex to go with a simple appraisal like that, so I leave them for the reader to consider and to weigh the balance in their own mind.

This will save newcomers a ton of search engine frustration, and that was the main motivation behind doing this. There are no "fake" reviews here. (...I'll add that!!)

As far as the "Embedded-In-Thread" types of reviews, they of course would have to be up to the caliber exhibited by, for instance, Review of Ultrasone Proline 750 with Cable on Right Side of Head instead of Left Side to pass muster and be included... I mean, I don't want this thing to get ridiculous!!!

Enjoy!

Terry
750prolinebx3.png
 
Mar 28, 2007 at 6:29 PM Post #2,877 of 5,942
One thing is funny I used to be behind in the burn in process but now I can see where others are in theirs.

One thing I wonder is how burned in Sovkillers headphone was before he spent the big bucks on the Edition 9:s
biggrin.gif
.

That the sound seemed to be behind the curtain oboy do I recognize that on my 750s. For me it is totally gone now so maybe you can try some more pink noise with them sovkiller
smily_headphones1.gif
. Not impossible that the Edition 9 is burned in already. As much as they cost Ultrasone can definiatly afford to offer the edition 9 buyers that service.

Just a thought
wink.gif
.

Otherwise I wonder how much different pairs compare to eachother?

If we talk about CPUs. There is generally good weeks and bad weeks. However there is always some super chips in each. Intel is hand picking the best cores for their quadcore cpus currently that is why newer weeks of core 2 duos is generally bad plus they want to increase the yield.
For the Core 2 duos after week 31 they have generally been quite bad for overclocking. pre 31 3,6 was almost the norm after that many struggle to get passed 3.2. They still do their rated speeds without a hitch so you can´t say they are faulty.

Now how much do the sound differs in different headphones of the same model. Do two 2500 or 750s for example sound the same? Or is there noticable differences here as well?

Maybe Ultrasone handpick the best drivers and put in the Edition 9:S
biggrin.gif
 
Mar 28, 2007 at 6:40 PM Post #2,878 of 5,942
Quote:

Originally Posted by oqvist /img/forum/go_quote.gif
One thing is funny I used to be behind in the burn in process but now I can see where others are in theirs.

One thing I wonder is how burned in Sovkillers headphone was before he spent the big bucks on the Edition 9:s
biggrin.gif
.

That the sound seemed to be behind the curtain oboy do I recognize that on my 750s. For me it is totally gone now so maybe you can try some more pink noise with them sovkiller
smily_headphones1.gif
. Not impossible that the Edition 9 is burned in already. As much as they cost Ultrasone can definiatly afford to offer the edition 9 buyers that service.

Just a thought
wink.gif
.

Otherwise I wonder how much different pairs compare to eachother?

If we talk about CPUs. There is generally good weeks and bad weeks. However there is always some super chips in each. Intel is hand picking the best cores for their quadcore cpus currently that is why newer weeks of core 2 duos is generally bad plus they want to increase the yield.
For the Core 2 duos after week 31 they have generally been quite bad for overclocking. pre 31 3,6 was almost the norm after that many struggle to get passed 3.2. They still do their rated speeds without a hitch so you can´t say they are faulty.

Now how much do the sound differs in different headphones of the same model. Do two 2500 or 750s for example sound the same? Or is there noticable differences here as well?

Maybe Ultrasone handpick the best drivers and put in the Edition 9:S
biggrin.gif



Man, I'm an old fellow here, I could neglet to skip some processes but not the burn in, and I know how to proceed in each case, I'm not a newbie...I waited long 200 hopurs before emiting any impression on my first pair of Editions, even though after the 200 mark I still felt they change somehow....

My old pair of 2500 was literally months old before I got the Editions...my two pairs of Editions were both fully burn in, I got the first one on the first batch in december, and the next in the second in february, using them 5 minutes a day both should be burn in by now don't you think? Let alone 24/7...I sold my pair of 2500 a week ago so they were fully burn in all of them by then...if I tell you that there is a difference to my ears, you cna trust me that it isa difference, and that is not due to the lack of burn in...

About hteo ther question they sounded alike, same as the editions, there is no variation to speak of from one pair to another, not even with old and new pads...
 
Mar 28, 2007 at 8:47 PM Post #2,879 of 5,942
If I had not been enjoying my 2500s so much lately, after the last five or six pages of this thread I think I would want to through them out.

I think the advocacy position for the Ultrasone sound is becoming more like "you would enjoy them more if you just let yourself believe." I really don't like the term brainwashing and I don't really think one needs to be brainwashed to enjoy them either if one is so inclined. But in my opinion, telling others they need to allow themselves to be brainwashed to enjoy them is not supportive of a positive position, but just the opposite. Some people will never like them because they hear things differently. That is the way of things.

I hope everyone has been enjoying themselves because it sure has not been fun for me reading much of this lately. I don't feel like I am brainwashed but I guess those who are would never admit to it anyway. So I may well just cop to it. I must have been brainwashed by the Ultrasone way of hearing the music I enjoy because I do. Objectively knowing now that I am brainwashed, can I be sure that I have been enjoying them or it is just some plot to make me think I am enjoying them. HELPPP!! .
biggrin.gif
biggrin.gif
biggrin.gif
 
Mar 28, 2007 at 9:18 PM Post #2,880 of 5,942
Quote:

Originally Posted by slwiser /img/forum/go_quote.gif
If I had not been enjoying my 2500s so much lately, after the last five or six pages of this thread I think I would want to through them out.


How long it took for you to get used to them? How did you achieved that, did you were comparing them back and forth constantly with other headphones? We all want to know, we are eager of new experiences with them, as all we know is what we have said, not much BTW, but there should be, and must be other ways of course, maybe you discovered a new way, and it will be more useful than criticize the old way that have worked for others..."Bring us solutions, no more problems..."
wink.gif
wink.gif
wink.gif


Quote:

I think the advocacy position for the Ultrasone sound is becoming more like "you would enjoy them more if you just let yourself believe." I really don't like the term brainwashing and I don't really think one needs to be brainwashed to enjoy them either if one is so inclined. But in my opinion, telling others they need to allow themselves to be brainwashed to enjoy them is not supportive of a positive position, but just the opposite. Some people will never like them because they hear things differently. That is the way of things.

I hope everyone has been enjoying themselves because it sure has not been fun for me reading much of this lately. I don't feel like I am brainwashed but I guess those who are would never admit to it anyway. So I may well just cop to it. I must have been brainwashed by the Ultrasone way of hearing the music I enjoy because I do. Objectively knowing now that I am brainwashed, can I be sure that I have been enjoying them or it is just some plot to make me think I am enjoying them. HELPPP!! .
biggrin.gif
biggrin.gif
biggrin.gif


We never said "brainwashed", we said brain transplant, that is different, and was an analogy as James used that term ironically at the beginning, and later on we keep on using it...

But of course that you do not need to believe, this is not a faith to embrace, and we all know that they are good enough to let you hear the truth (the ones who like them of course) and this is a real feeling for us, and this is the only way till now that had prove to be effective, but there must be other ways as well...just as an example: I was fighting for a week with them and the CD3K, comparing them side by side, and know what? Never adjust myself to that unique presentation they offer. I contacted Ultrasone, and later on I gave them a second chance, following some advices, after discussing with Florian and others, I decided to try a different approach, and stopped listening the CD3K for a while, and begin to look and try to hear those strengths that I was told the headphone had, the natural presentation, etc...and honestly, I found it, if I would have not found it, I would say the same, that is BS, but that was not the case, and this was the effective way to find it, for me, and for some others as well, maybe for you is another way...but it makes sense, to me, that if you keep on reinforcing the unnatural presentation others offer, you never adjust yourself for the natural presentation of the S-logic effect...

I will use the same analogy, try to drive a car on the right seat, like in some places in Europe, see if you can do it the first day, and if it will be easier for you, to do it changing back and forth to the same old left side, all the time...

And please, I'm talking of just the presentation, the soundstage, not the curves, freq extension, neutrality, accuracy, colorations, etc...just the presentation...for the rest, as any other headphone, it has its strengths and flaws, you can like it or not, but the presentation is what made me feel weird at the beginning, with their new sound, and I used that trick, maybe for others with more adaptability will be easier, and another way will work...
We just offer what we had used, and what we know works...you offer what you know, and what you have tried, and we will have a complete picture, anyway we all know that at the end you have to be your judge, and try them for yourself...
wink.gif
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top