Quote:
Originally Posted by sacd lover /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Why? Because I think this 200+ hours burn in that people claim is necessary is nonsense. Name a headphone that members say changes more with burn in than the 701. I didnt think there was hardly difference at all with a new 701 compared to one with 350+ hours. So why would I think the 2500 would be any different .... and I dont.
You can argue headrooms qualifications all you like but they are definitely an informed opinion and someone I would trust more than some unknown reviewer. Furthermore, what about the numerous owners with 200+ hours burn in that still feel they are sibilant? What about the owners that like the Ultrasones and still admit they are sibilant? You act as if there is this landslide of public opinion that the Ultrasones are perfect.
Biggest on the planet, doing them a favor .... what are you talking about?
|
One heapdhone that change more than the 701? I could mention a few, but just will mention the two that are related to this discussion, both PROLines, the 2500 and the 750, believe it or not...that is a fact...period, I will not argue more about that subject, if you want to believe it, good, if not, to me is completelly irrelevant. Others had experieced these same changes, and just becasue you refuse to believe it, that will not make more or less truthful...
BTW Whom are those numerous owners that believe that they are sibilant after the burn in??? And whom are those numerous owners that like the Ultrasone sound and admit they are sibilant? IMO there are not even numerous owners in head-fi yet, but IIRC are you, an another couple of fellows...IMO if someone that likes sibilance is a masochist, sibilance is not a pleasant effect to enjoy at all, even though, in some recordings you have no other choice, and if you have a good pair of heapdhones, you will hear it...
They are not perfect, and for the last time, I sold mine, if they were perfect, I still would owned them, but simply I prefer the Editions to the PROLines by a good margin, but the sibilance was not the reson why I sold them, that is for sure...As any heapdhone, they are far from being perfect, but I do consider others being a lot more distant from that qualification, and they are considered by many as such.
I never argued about the Headroom qualifications, where did I said that? Please do not change what I said OK? I said that many members had questioned the rating system they have, and that I do not agree in
all their opinions, that is different...