toaster
Headphoneus Supremus
The irony in this statement is mildly amusing.I moved on from Timeless in short while whereas my sense now is that Supermoon may be an IEM for the ages for me.
The irony in this statement is mildly amusing.I moved on from Timeless in short while whereas my sense now is that Supermoon may be an IEM for the ages for me.
Your rating is based on just sound quality or aggregate, ie form factor/portability, etc?
Definitely keen to hear Supermoon. I’m gonna demo it in a few weeks when the Trifecta lands at my local dealer.
I could demo it again at the store, from what I recall; wearing it felt heavy, and the size is massive. Mids were tuned like Acoustune overall
I'd love to finally hear a CFA IEM I like.
When are the announcements due?
Precisely why I have completely shifted to full range DD iems over BA and hybrids/tribrids etc. The DD timbre and accompanying musicality has become just too important to me over BA precision and technicalities.
The irony in this statement is mildly amusing.
Dang, even shorter nozzles than the Z1R???Just watched a reviewer put MADOO side by side with Sony Ier-z1r, about same size, 711 has shorter nozzle.
Planar bass so far, it’s been the AB1266 for me. I haven’t heard the Sus or the Solitaire P though so I don’t know how those two sound. But my second choice would be the D8000 Pro then followed by the Elite.I'm with you here. Size is what gives planar the edge in the headphone world. I'm about to publish my review of the Solitaire P (watch this space over the next day or two), and it's easily the best of the planars I've heard (that includes the LCD 3, which I absolutely loved). I haven't heard the 1266, but that's the only planar I'm aware of that's supposed to rival the very best DD sub-bass. And for the record, I'm not a Utopia fan - at all (DD I know, but you mentioned it).
It's not so much the slam I'm after, but the sense of weight and rumble that you get from a subwoofer. I'm yet to see any planar subwoofers for that very reason. As for IEMs, the SM hype feels like it's going to ignite real interest in IEM planar tech, but like a great silver cable, a great IEM planar is not going to be easy or cheap to make. I'm on team SM here...I'd love to finally hear a CFA IEM I like.
When are the announcements due?
The Typ 711 is definitely the chonky boi. I’m sure my ears would be able to handle them well. I just need to hear themSome wild photos of Typ711. Fit is as expected, too big for my ears. I could fit the nozzle 90% of its width, but I couldn't get a deep seated insert, so must hold with both hands while listening
Sound was quite resolving. A hint of harshness in the lower-treble, and slight thinness in the lower-mids making the sound a bit lacking in weight and solid foundation. Bass was OK, not too impressive, play its part adequately well. Treble have pretty high definition courtesy of its micro planars. A good sense of width and layering to each notes
And some other stuff
Old Noble Khan was quite impressive too, good sub-bass reach & rumble, but not too much in quantity. Smooth beautiful treble, with good resolving mids. Lovely vocals (especially female vocals), really liking what the piezoelectric does! Curious to hear how the Kublai Khan fares, interesting find
HS1697 Acoustune, has darker weightier mids than Typ711, but essentially quite close in their mids' character. Both have similar thinness to their mids that sounded slightly cold and metallic to my ears. Good punchy & boomy bass
And lastly new FitEar prototype called Silver. Very good lower-mids, and solid all-rounder. Has that FitEar house sound, and lift in the upper-mids. But not too much to tilt it off-balance. Nice & simple sound
Hi, have you had a chance to try N8ii > C9 versus N8ii alone? I'm genuinely curious if there's any improvements in the SQ esp dynamics and soundstage.New milestone in my portable audio journey. The N8ii. What a DAP! It actually is more than a DAP… so many features and snappy UI. Having the C9 at hand increases the field of possibilities.
Source, amp and drivers…Satin Audio Perseus copper interconnect and IEM cables coming soon…
I've asked this question a few times as well, mixed opinion it would seem. Might pick one up used to see for myself...Hi, have you had a chance to try N8ii > C9 versus N8ii alone? I'm genuinely curious if there's any improvements in the SQ esp dynamics and soundstage.
Tried Timeless and S12...none can match the DD timbre. I'd rather go with a well tuned DD...of course, I haven't heard the Euclid or Supermoon or even Simphonio P10, so can't comment on how kilobuck planars sound. Even in case of headphones, I didn't particularly like the planar ones.Preach bro...the beauty of planars is that you get a piece of both worlds.
Yes, I've done the exercise with Aroma Jewel and Sony IER-Z1R. Both sound better out of the DAP/AMP stack, but it's not night-and-day, far from it. My N8ii has only 12 hours on the counter, so I won't draw final conclusions too soon. The mids from the Jewel are fuller and rounder out of the stack, that's about it. The Z1R hits even harder and deeper with the C9 linked to the N8ii and the mids are slightly meatier. We are talking about 5%-10% better overall. At max. No difference in soundstage with both IEMs.Hi, have you had a chance to try N8ii > C9 versus N8ii alone? I'm genuinely curious if there's any improvements in the SQ esp dynamics and soundstage.
I'm tempted to buy another Timeless just to compare it to Supermoon.
It's those that already have C9 prior to N8ii that I feel are maybe trying to justify keeping C9. Enjoy your burn in with N8ii, to my ears and a few others it 100% changes for the better with quite a few more hours than yours has. Good things to come...Yes, I've done the exercise with Aroma Jewel and Sony IER-Z1R. Both sound better out of the DAP/AMP stack, but it's not night-and-day, far from it. My N8ii has only 12 hours in the counter, so I won't draw final conclusions too soon. The mids from the Jewel are fuller and rounder out of the stack, that's about it. The Z1R hits even harder and deeper with the C9 linked to the N8ii and the mids are slightly meatier. We are talking about 5%-10% better overall. At max.
At USD 1.6K, the C9 is not a mandatory purchase to enjoy the N8ii as it is. It's completely overkill actually, unless you have deep pockets or the wish to add extra flavors on the already chameleonesque caracter of the N8ii. Thing is, I had a C9 before getting the N8ii, so...you know...
I really hear a big difference when I add in the C9. Spent a few hours today with the stack, bass is bigger, deeper and more textured, stage size is larger and more refined. Mids, as said above, get a bit thicker and more detailed as well. It's a different vibe for sure.Hi, have you had a chance to try N8ii > C9 versus N8ii alone? I'm genuinely curious if there's any improvements in the SQ esp dynamics and soundstage.
Yeah, will let the N8ii getting some more playing hours, of course. I am not someone who need to justify keeping a piece of gear. I will keep the C9 anyway, for the Calyx M alone. This DAP and the C9 together sound better than anything so far.It's those that already have C9 prior to N8ii that I feel are maybe trying to justify keeping C9. Enjoy your burn in with N8ii, to my ears and a few others it 100% changes for the better with quite a few more hours than yours has. Good things to come...
Don't have my N8II yet but that's what I noticed myself yesterday firing up my C9 + DX300 (with Amp12 Line Out) for the first timeI really hear a big difference when I add in the C9. Spent a few hours today with the stack, bass is bigger, deeper and more textured, stage size is larger and more refined. Mids, as said above, get a bit thicker and more detailed as well. It's a different vibe for sure.
But N8ii by itself is fabulous and the C9 is by no means a neccesary addition. If you don't already own the C9 I wouldn't necessarily advise to buy it, as the N8ii is really good by itself. But if you do own it, I love the combo. I prefer it over the DAP alone 110%.