bizkid
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2006
- Posts
- 1,468
- Likes
- 258
Quote:
Sorry to burst your bubble but you are way off here, actually you got it backwards. You can't compare these "studio" headphones as they have completely different applications already explained by John Willet. Studio doesnt automatically mean neutral, even many studio speakers arent that neutral either.
Those you mentioned are pretty mediocre, besides the shure i heard them all. They all have boosted bass and treble in common, mids are seriously lacking. Nowhere near the accuracy of k701 or stax 404, there's already worlds between them. So they absolutely fail at whats supposed to be the HD800s strongest point.
Originally Posted by odigg /img/forum/go_quote.gif Wouldn't it make sense to compare the HD800 to other headphones that are designed to be neutral? The K701 is touted as a neutral headphone, albeit a little bass shy. There are a number of "Studio Monitor" headphones like the Senn HD280, Senn HD380, M-Audio Q40, Audio Technica M50, Sony 7506,7509, the new Shure headphones, etc. The price difference between these basic studio monitors and HD800 is huge, but if the sound is 95% the same... |
Sorry to burst your bubble but you are way off here, actually you got it backwards. You can't compare these "studio" headphones as they have completely different applications already explained by John Willet. Studio doesnt automatically mean neutral, even many studio speakers arent that neutral either.
Those you mentioned are pretty mediocre, besides the shure i heard them all. They all have boosted bass and treble in common, mids are seriously lacking. Nowhere near the accuracy of k701 or stax 404, there's already worlds between them. So they absolutely fail at whats supposed to be the HD800s strongest point.