- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Posts
- 8,337
- Likes
- 4,694
334 Studio Reference!
You mean like thisThanks, Anakchan. But I would rather Suyama san come out with a new CIEM rather than do the same thing as he did with the 335....
You mean like this
http://ohm-image.net/opinion/audiophile/fitear/fostex-te100-hybrid-collaboration-earphone
Where do you guys see all of these versions? All I know is FitEar only has 334 and 335, plus some other cheaper ones like Aya, etc...
But it's been 5 years now , they haven't come out with a really better iem than the 335
Guys, i have some questions
1. Can i make a mh335dw Studio reference directly or i must have mh335dw first and upgrade later ?
2. How about sound quality mh335dw sr compare with k10 ?
3. Is mh335dw sr sound better with balanced cables ( chord mojo ) ?
Sorry for my bad english
1) Fitear SR only allow to upgrade later
2) SR sound more boomy then K10 that's base on my opinion. K10 have better clarity.
3) Yes.
My personal opinion, take a look at the MH334-SR route instead if available (i.e. if you're in Japan). After today's 2nd demo, I have to say I would prefer the MH334-SR over my MH335DW-SR. As for MH334-SR vs K10U Al, hmmm...need more time to demo between the two.
How does it compare to the original MH334 then?
What are the differences between the two? And also between the original 334?
Thinking of a fitear as my next upgrade and I'm debating a 334 vs 335.
I never had the original MH334....@Donnyhifi does. I actually compared the MH334-SR to the TG!334 instead today and they are more similar sounding. In the past I compared the TG!334 to MH334, and felt the TG!334 had a little more treble extension over the original MH334 but the MH334 was more holographic. As such through inference, the MH334-SR should have more treble extension over the original MH334.