originalsnuffy
Headphoneus Supremus
Ah, good memories of the original X3. Still loved the way Joe Bloggs let us vote on features.
The X3 II was really good also
The X3 II was really good also
Anything with 3.4 which is the latest and most stable firmware?Still using my X3 1st generation, and I keep going back and forth between firmwares 2.10 and 3.34 final. 2.10 sounds better to me in headphones and my vehicle, but of course 3.34 will let me index way more than 5800 files. But I just can't get 3.34 to sound good in my truck!
I just put 3.4 on, and I'll have to find out how it's different from 3.34. But I still like the sound quality of 2.1 more. I'm just going to have to get used to the later firmwares. My 12,000-file library needs it. I just haven't found the right bass-treble setting to make it sound acceptable.Anything with 3.4 which is the latest and most stable firmware?
Hmm. Maybe my headphones are the problem with seeing the benefits of firmwares 3.34 and 3.4. I use Grado SR125 (with low gain), so maybe I'll try my AKG K240 Studio (with high gain).There are a couple of annoying glitches with 3.4, or maybe have been there before hand too.
1: every time you go to the return to now playing from the quick menu if you have had the track playing from memory, eg when the unit has been turned on and off, it will always skip back to a random position on an earlier song, despite saying it is playing something else. The way of preventing this is to press the return key to go to the track selection then pressing enter, then it never has the issue.
The other issue is with the EQ. It says states it is on after you power on the device had you left it on when powered off. However, you need to manually switch it off then on again every time. Annoying but you just have to get used to it. The bass and treble are not effected by this.
I however think that if you are in a quiet environment and have good headphones, it sounds more than acceptable without any bass/treble adjustments.
Hmm. Maybe my headphones are the problem with seeing the benefits of firmwares 3.34 and 3.4. I use Grado SR125 (with low gain), so maybe I'll try my AKG K240 Studio (with high gain).
Later: Okay, I think I can live with that, using the AKGs. It all may ultimately be a matter of acclimation - my ears were used to 2.1, so anything else seemed weird.
Headphone VS Line Out question.
I use my X3 in my car. I have always had it connected to my car amps with the Line Out. The Line out sends a very strong/loud signal.
As such, some of my electronic tracks (which are extremely loudly encoded) have started to glitch/clip.
So today I tried switching the output from the Line Out to the headphones. I have no gain or audio adjustments set (since that is all done on my car head unit). I noticed that headphone out at FULL 120 volume was the same loudness as the Line Out. So I turned the volume down to 110, and it solved the clipping/glitching issue.
I just wanted to make sure I am not losing quality doing this!
Having no adjustments (eq, treble, bass etc) made to the output should keep it pretty close to line out right?
I wish there were a 'normalize' option for the line out - to ensure it doesn't send out a clipped signal.
I also notice that on many devices such as smaller bluetooth speakers, the line out basically seems to send a too power signal for them to handle, and they do distort. In some instances, I do have to use the headphone socket. But one thing worth knowing is that the battery will be consumed significantly faster using the headphone socket as you are using the in built amplifier, which is bypassed if you use the line out.Headphone VS Line Out question.
I use my X3 in my car. I have always had it connected to my car amps with the Line Out. The Line out sends a very strong/loud signal. As such, some of my electronic tracks (which are extremely loudly encoded) have started to glitch/clip.
So today I tried switching the output from the Line Out to the headphones. I have no gain or audio adjustments set (since that is all done on my car head unit). I noticed that headphone out at FULL 120 volume was the same loudness as the Line Out. So I turned the volume down to 110, and it solved the clipping/glitching issue.
I just wanted to make sure I am not losing quality doing this! Having no adjustments (eq, treble, bass etc) made to the output should keep it pretty close to line out right?
I wish there were a 'normalize' option for the line out - to ensure it doesn't send out a clipped signal.
Thank you very much for the in depth answer! I will continue to use the headphone output!It's not all that "strong/loud."
Sony Red Book spec says 2V. The X3 IIRC is 1.9V. "Loud" in terms of line signals is like a head unit preamp that goes all the way to 8V so you can send an 8V signal to a 2,000w subwoofer and register 150dB and crack the windshield.
Your main problem here is you don't have a receiver to control the preamp output level. Even an Eclipse HU that has an 8V doesn't go from "no sound" to '8V TO 2,000WATT AMPS FOR DA BAAAASSSSSSSSSSSSSS" at a hair's twist of the knob, so you can use a 2V line output and then turn the sound down a bit. Same way that if you were at home nearly all CDPs with an SE output will output between 1.8V to 2V (a few bad ones can go higher), and you have an integrated amp's preamp circuit or a dedicated preamp controlling the output to match the amp. The difference there is home audio amps tend to have a fixed gain unlike car amps and pro amps, but either way, a preamp (even a passive one) can help control the voltage of the signal going into the amp to match its input sensitivity and gain.
In short...you really have no choice. Either get get a processor that has a volume control by remote (wired and installed knob up front or remote), or use the headphone output so you can control the volume. Unless you want to use the variable gain on the amp as a volume control and reach down/back there all the time and feed that processor a coax signal from the X3...but then again if you can even find one with a coax input chances are it'll be the really expensive stuff that was designed to run 3-way/4-way full active.
If it was a normal audio track, you'd noticeably lose some sound quality by sending a slightly weaker signal and depending on the amplification circuit in use cranking it up to compensate might make it worse.
In your case, you're already starting with a quashed dynamic range, Loudness War frontline division, so despite using the headphone output which on a DAP like the X3 actually runs through the headphone driver output opamps, it actually improves the sound. If at least in the sense of not having clipping that an otherwise normal line signal would have in that system.
Still the main problem is in your system you don't even have convenient unity gain unless you use the headphone output, and as much as there are possible downsides, even without hearing it I'd tell you the upsides are more than worth it. At least, apart from getting an HU or processor.
Pretty close but not ideal. But then again, it's actually an improvement, if for that music and without getting other hardware to regulate the line signal.
Run your Loudness War copies through a Replay Gain feature and reduce the digital gain there. If that improves it, if at least to remove clipping (it will not restore dynamic range), then good.
Or well just a passive preamp between the DAP and the amp but still, might as well use the headphone out.
Thank you very much for the in depth answer! I will continue to use the headphone output!
PS - there is an add on box for my head unit that allows for AUX inputs, and this box has a gain knob. The next time the car is torn down (yes, this box is buried behind the dash) I will adjust that knob down a notch and see if THAT alone helps reduce the signal problem.