Shure SRH 940 impression and support thread
Dec 1, 2011 at 11:19 PM Post #2,416 of 3,855


Quote:
On latest review from amazon:
 
biggrin.gif
. Just to annoy people that think they are not worth their price.


And here we go again...
 
 
Dec 2, 2011 at 1:39 AM Post #2,417 of 3,855
It takes to long for mine to get here.
frown.gif

 
Dec 2, 2011 at 11:35 AM Post #2,418 of 3,855
Quote:
Ok i decided to go for it. I just placed an order for the shure srh940.


Nice, I'm surprised though, the SRH-1040 will be announced in 3 days from now?
 
 
Quote:
What has to be taken seriously, the fact that revealing is a double edge sword....  


Hmmm I think revealing is always good, Ety ER-4 isn't revealing enough.
 

Quote:
[/] headband snapped at the weakest point
 

 
Sorry to hear that.

 
Quote:
[/] it is getting to the point that is reminding me of the details that i heard from the SR-009

Quote:
Simply put, the Shure SRH-940 is one of the best sounding dynamic headphones under $900, easily. [/] there's not really anything better short of electrostatics or something like the $1500 Sennheiser HD 800


Lol.
 
 
 
Dec 2, 2011 at 6:34 PM Post #2,419 of 3,855
New review available from "Sound on Sound" magazine (before you got to pay to access article).
You learn that the srh940 are "perfect for rock" (just like grados ?).
They are hard to beat for guitar based music.
They lack the bass for electronica to provide an "emotional experience".
But for most studio purposes, "the frequency balance of these phones, with its ruthless absence of hype at the low end, is much more a blessing than a curse.".
http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/oct11/articles/shure-srh940.htm
 
 
Dec 2, 2011 at 6:57 PM Post #2,420 of 3,855
 
Quote:
he phones themselves appear to be solidly built from a firm grey plastic

 
I must not have the same definition of robust,hum. Even SRH840 is much more robust, imo.
 
 
Quote:
They’re perfect for rock music

 
They lack too much bass to be good with rock. SR325is for example, is much better with rock, no comparison. Though I m not a basshead, but SRH940 is the first headphone I own or i have the impression of lacking bass.
 
 
Dec 2, 2011 at 7:12 PM Post #2,422 of 3,855
I haven't tried.
 
Dec 2, 2011 at 9:57 PM Post #2,423 of 3,855
U can hear the bass, but u can't feeeel the bass..like a d2000,
Just try some firebird song from a Stravinsky or wat ever his name.
:wink:
 
Dec 2, 2011 at 10:29 PM Post #2,425 of 3,855


Quote:
New review available from "Sound on Sound" magazine (before you got to pay to access article).
You learn that the srh940 are "perfect for rock" (just like grados ?).
They are hard to beat for guitar based music.
They lack the bass for electronica to provide an "emotional experience".
But for most studio purposes, "the frequency balance of these phones, with its ruthless absence of hype at the low end, is much more a blessing than a curse.".
http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/oct11/articles/shure-srh940.htm
 



Ok now i'm excited.
 
Dec 2, 2011 at 10:59 PM Post #2,428 of 3,855
The only "serious" Bass IS in Classical Music (same can be said of Dynamics also)! The one note, over synth-ed drone of contemporary Muz-icky is flagellating at it's very best! 
 
Dec 3, 2011 at 11:37 AM Post #2,430 of 3,855
I don't think the 6400 was really a good headphone. The 8400, when comparing side by side, was much better at least in distinguishing musical information across the spectrum. Not sure about which has a more balanced FR, but if one were to try both out without this preconception, my guess would be that he would pick the 8400. 
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top