bagwell359
Headphoneus Supremus
I like a lot of things about them. Foremost:
Piano timbre from top to bottom. Lots of $1k cans can't do it.
Plug and play. I would rather listen to my HE-500's and 6 SE on most music - but they required much time and effort in mods and EQ to get them that way. 600 likes fresh pads.
But, they are much more musical with a better more defined stage (although it's not quite right), more bass between 35-70 Hz, and the occasional spareness/ascetic edge in the treble is gone (very possibly amp owns some of that - with my OTL tube amp and the same story is echoed by others. Is there more harmonic distortion? Sure. Is any recording/mixing/transcription 100% accurate? 15 ips with 3 ribbon mics in a great Hall, with no spotlight mics? Maybe the best attainable - but even that isn't 100%.
In the 80's we were told that 16/144 contained all the musical information that was needed. So 192, 384, 768 and 24 bits is just marketing and voodoo? Face it the recording/playback chain is far from perfect so trying to reproduce that is what? It's off the mark in terms of music as heard. I wasn't happy with tube amps on speakers because they were not the same top to bottom (mushy bass and reticent highs). But small signal tubes in pre amps and headphone amps - that's different. I still prefer SS, but on the HD-600 and 800, they sound less like music than the stock BHC at my ears - even 3 SS amps that cost $1695 or more.
Piano timbre from top to bottom. Lots of $1k cans can't do it.
Plug and play. I would rather listen to my HE-500's and 6 SE on most music - but they required much time and effort in mods and EQ to get them that way. 600 likes fresh pads.
But, they are much more musical with a better more defined stage (although it's not quite right), more bass between 35-70 Hz, and the occasional spareness/ascetic edge in the treble is gone (very possibly amp owns some of that - with my OTL tube amp and the same story is echoed by others. Is there more harmonic distortion? Sure. Is any recording/mixing/transcription 100% accurate? 15 ips with 3 ribbon mics in a great Hall, with no spotlight mics? Maybe the best attainable - but even that isn't 100%.
In the 80's we were told that 16/144 contained all the musical information that was needed. So 192, 384, 768 and 24 bits is just marketing and voodoo? Face it the recording/playback chain is far from perfect so trying to reproduce that is what? It's off the mark in terms of music as heard. I wasn't happy with tube amps on speakers because they were not the same top to bottom (mushy bass and reticent highs). But small signal tubes in pre amps and headphone amps - that's different. I still prefer SS, but on the HD-600 and 800, they sound less like music than the stock BHC at my ears - even 3 SS amps that cost $1695 or more.
Last edited: