Snips
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2011
- Posts
- 224
- Likes
- 16
This thread isn't exclusively about cables, it's about the HD600, right?
Heh. For a moment I thought I was at the wrong section of the forums.
This thread isn't exclusively about cables, it's about the HD600, right?
I completely disagree. The HD600s scale tremendously well. In fact, they are legendary for their scaling in all kinds of review and audiophile circles. I have tried mine on many amps, and I can confirm they scale extremely well. When driven by Trafomatic Head One, it's basically endgame for me. On my FiiO E11, it's just the start of the journey.
Messaged Brooko and Purple and wish I took their advice and ordered the NFB-12 / NFB-15.
Not feeling anything more from Objective 2 amp + D2x as i am straight from D2X.
Volume 85 % on Asus control panal (same without amp) and Amp has gain pushed in and on the 5th mark on amp.
Please someone tell me where I'm going wrong.
I already know d2x has impedance of 100-ohms, not sure
I am using v moda red cable from front plug (green on xonar d2x) to amp.
Are you saying you cannot get any more volume with the D2+O2 than you can with the D2X alone? Or are you saying that you cannot tell the difference between them with regard to sound quality?
I would be very surprised if its the former, and not at all surprised by the latter.
Boring...anyone with a brain knows the HD600s are the must have, best headphones ever.
I want talk about things we'll never agree about!
If you refuse to talk about cables we will resort to isolation...spikes vs sorbothane...your choice..cheers!
In a couple of weeks I hope to audition three amps around the £500 mark.
According to you guys I won't hear any difference?
In a couple of weeks I hope to audition three amps around the £500 mark.
According to you guys I won't hear any difference?
It depends on the amp. Some people think that it scales extremely well, while others think that it doesn't. The bottom line is, trust your ears.
I am actually a bit worried about "trusting my ears". There seems to be so much subliminal stuff going on when listening.
I reckon it could be easy to be seduced by a "warm" sound only to decide later that it was "veiled" or a "detailed" sound could become "sterile"!
I'm a long time audio taper and we've had many discussion on taper forums about the merits of cable upgrades. I'm a new member here on head-fi and a new owner of a pair of HD600s. While there's never been a debate that cable upgrades for higher quality and better reliability can be cost justified, the taper community has had a harder time providing non-subjective data to show that the benefits are real from a sound perspective. I've done the due diligence searching the head-fi forums for more than 'my new cable sounds awesome', but haven't been successful. Can anyone point me to any objective testing that has been done on this subject? Thanks.
While there's never been a debate that cable upgrades for higher quality and better reliability can be cost justified,
I've done the due diligence searching the head-fi forums for more than 'my new cable sounds awesome', but haven't been successful.
Can anyone point me to any objective testing that has been done on this subject? Thanks.