oqvist
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2004
- Posts
- 8,145
- Likes
- 307
Yes they dont have the exact same sound signature
Yes they dont have the exact same sound signature
I think the amp inside the ADI-2 is actually quite good, but there is definitely an improvement with the 789.Are there noticeable differences when listening to your headphones using the ADI-2 alone versus ADI-2 + THX 789?
I don´t dare to speak for others but on the LCD-2 it was a clear improvement but that requires power to blossom. HD 800S that one also performed what I consider better. Bryceus finding works well with those headphones. For someone that spend a fortune on a RME DAC the THX 789 AAA could be considered very cheap and a bargain so yes I am happy I spent the extra.Thanks. Understood. Not the "exact" same. But is the difference better clearly, or just better perhaps for some? (I am not talking about cases where more power is needed - the ADI-2 has plenty for most) I am asking because I went down this road with the Gilmore Lite Mk2 based on advice in this forum and ultimately I went back to ADI-2 alone. I genuinely wonder if in most cases adding an amp to the ADI-2 is just for the love of the gear and resulting in fact in more cables and needless complexity.
I think the amp inside the ADI-2 is actually quite good, but there is definitely an improvement with the 789.
The 789 has a bigger stage overall, much more depth, as well as better dynamics. The ADI-2 can seem a bit compressed in comparison and delivers an inferior imaging experience.
The ADI-2 sounds busier as a result of the smaller stage and lack of layering/
The 789 does a better job resolving micro-detail.
The ADI-2 has a slight mid-bass hump, and some sub-bass roll-off. The 789 feels more linear and reaches deeper. In terms of bass the 789 also has significantly more punch.
The 789 is overall cleaner, clearer, and faster.
The 789 is phenomenal. The ADI-2 DAC is a nice built in amp to an amazing DAC.
I almost exclusively listen to the 789 via XLR, however, for the sake of comparison I was just listening to the 789 via the 1/4" to give a more direct comparison. Everything I mentioned holds true via the 1/4" output of the 789.
I'm currently listening through the Auteurs, but the improvements from the 789 over the ADI-2 amp was even more noticeable with the Ether 2 and about the same with the Clear.
Just got a Verite, so I am trying to see which is the best amp for it.....between the THX and LP.Agreed more intimate on the ADI. I didn't mention speed in my comparison but I think that's where the 789 is pulling ahead in clarity and being cleaner since it just feels so precise and exact, especially during busy songs. I got lucky to get the 789 in the second drop, and before the price went up, and yea for the price it's a bargain. Between the ADI and the 789 I don't see any future solid state upgrades necessary. I'm definitely looking forward to getting a tube amp again in the future to harmonize with the Auteurs.
Either way the ADI is a fantastic piece of equipment, arguably one of my favorite audio purchases to date.
Dude congrats! The Verite is on my endgame HP list.Just got a Verite, so I am trying to see which is the best amp for it.....between the THX and LP.
Oops, I got the last one from TSAV. Breaking it and my ears in!Dude congrats! The Verite is on my endgame HP list.
I tried to buy one from the recent TSAV sale but I was about 5 hours too late to notice it and Alan said they were all gone :’(
I'm not noticing much difference between the two. A bit hard to A/B since volume match isn't possible (xlr +6db). The only two things I feel like I noticed were more bass texture over balanced and a bit flatter sound with RCA. But I'm completely open to this being placebo.Is there difference between single & balanced from Adi 2 to thx 789?
I have the exact same setup and currently using rca from dac to amp. Been wondering if I should I upgrade to balanced cable.