rhythmdevils
Member of the Trade: rhythmdevils audio
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2005
- Posts
- 8,225
- Likes
- 485
not really, it can be had at some audio equipment stores for the same.
Originally Posted by WhiteBear /img/forum/go_quote.gif M50 is better in any way. Except fit may be... |
It is not studio monitor headphone! Not even close.
It is DJ headphones. Great body. May be better than M50's.
Bass heavy,dark ,but not as detailed and transparent as M50 sound.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dogteal /img/forum/go_quote.gif
This was exactly my thought as well after reading the review. IMO M50 right now represent THE headphone to beat in the sub $100 category.
The M50 is only sub $100 on eBay. In regular shops it's typically in the $110 to $160 range. Calling it a sub $100 headphone is a bit of a stretch. MSRP on the M50 is $199.
Quote:
Originally Posted by oqvist /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Bigger then most open headphoens? What open references?
>=Ultrasone 2500 Pro,Grado SR325i,AKG k702
Close to Sennheiser HD650
IMHO
hmmm. . .
so would that mean that the FA-003 has bigger/better soundstage than the Ultrasone Pro 750? that would be quite impressive
also, can you comment on whether you prefer the Ultrasone 2500 Pro or FA-003 for rock and why?
Very interested in these phones. Can anyone/Will anyone tell me how they preform compared to other $80 headphones? Or the M50's?
I've been stuck with ipod buds lately and I'd love for good, sub-$100, portable headphones. If anyone has any suggestions, just message me with them or reply here.
Yes.
Yes.
FA-003 is too relaxed ,too flat. Bass is much less punchy and deep. Sound is not as detailed and crisp.
For my taste Ultrasone 2500 Pro is the best headphones I heard. Deep punchy bass. Cristal clear and transparent sound. Sparkling treble. No sibilance after burn in. It is like armature IEM with soundstage and more refined sound.
It is not the best technically. But it is more inspiring. IMHO