- Joined
- Apr 28, 2007
- Posts
- 5,494
- Likes
- 1,084
Quote:
The $500 PCM-D50 and the $1800 PCM-D1 are much better recorders, but far worse at playback than that had with the PCM-M10 - according to a couple of experienced people at The Taperssection Forums. Apparently, it's only with the more recently released PCM-M10 that Sony engineers decided to include a good DAC.
In their two larger, more expensive PCM decks, playback quality was just a convenience feature - for monitoring while recording - through the built-in mono speaker, or a cheap pair of field phones. Even with the PCM-M10, most users couldn't care less about the recorder's built-in playback quality. Recordists are typically only interested in "listening" with their sound editor, once they've transferred the files to a PC or Mac. We lucky audiophiles can actually enjoy a better DAP via the less expensive of three offerings!
Mike
Thanks, mike. I had a hard time to understand what other threads talked about the PCM-M10 but your write-up does help me to stop wondering. What is your opinion on the PCM-D50?
The $500 PCM-D50 and the $1800 PCM-D1 are much better recorders, but far worse at playback than that had with the PCM-M10 - according to a couple of experienced people at The Taperssection Forums. Apparently, it's only with the more recently released PCM-M10 that Sony engineers decided to include a good DAC.
In their two larger, more expensive PCM decks, playback quality was just a convenience feature - for monitoring while recording - through the built-in mono speaker, or a cheap pair of field phones. Even with the PCM-M10, most users couldn't care less about the recorder's built-in playback quality. Recordists are typically only interested in "listening" with their sound editor, once they've transferred the files to a PC or Mac. We lucky audiophiles can actually enjoy a better DAP via the less expensive of three offerings!
Mike