FlyByNight
Head-Fier
- Joined
- May 18, 2007
- Posts
- 58
- Likes
- 0
So, crisis out of the way, on to first impressions...particularly since I have not seen any comparison yet with the RSA Shadow, which I would have thought is the most similar competing product to the Pico Slim.
Minor Issues: Pico Slim does not pick up the faint iPod hard drive spin-up whine that the Shadow does when secured against the back of the iPod 5G. However, the Slim does exhibit that big switch-on pop/thump. Connectors slide in & out of the Shadow much more easily, yet remain secure. The Shadow has a nice brushed-aluminum finish that doesn't show fingerprints or scratches, whereas the Slim's glossy surface is gorgeous but makes me worried about both.
Sound quality: Very little difference to my ears between the Slim and the Shadow. The Slim does seem a bit more "transparent" or "open" in the mid and mid-high ranges; whereas the Shadow seems to have a very subtle "darker" quality. Any such difference is very small though--they both sound terrific. (This listening with UM3X 'phones) Need more time to decide which signature I prefer (keeping both not being an option
)
Ergonomics: Given the lack of really significant SQ difference, my choice of a keeper may come down to how each amp handles. Both are tiny and very well built; I think the Pico Slim's thin and long form factor better complements the iPod. Both of them complicate my life by placing the input and output jacks on opposite ends. The choice between volume knob or spring switch is probably the biggest factor; and will also require some time living with the Pico Slim to figure out which I prefer.
Minor Issues: Pico Slim does not pick up the faint iPod hard drive spin-up whine that the Shadow does when secured against the back of the iPod 5G. However, the Slim does exhibit that big switch-on pop/thump. Connectors slide in & out of the Shadow much more easily, yet remain secure. The Shadow has a nice brushed-aluminum finish that doesn't show fingerprints or scratches, whereas the Slim's glossy surface is gorgeous but makes me worried about both.
Sound quality: Very little difference to my ears between the Slim and the Shadow. The Slim does seem a bit more "transparent" or "open" in the mid and mid-high ranges; whereas the Shadow seems to have a very subtle "darker" quality. Any such difference is very small though--they both sound terrific. (This listening with UM3X 'phones) Need more time to decide which signature I prefer (keeping both not being an option
Ergonomics: Given the lack of really significant SQ difference, my choice of a keeper may come down to how each amp handles. Both are tiny and very well built; I think the Pico Slim's thin and long form factor better complements the iPod. Both of them complicate my life by placing the input and output jacks on opposite ends. The choice between volume knob or spring switch is probably the biggest factor; and will also require some time living with the Pico Slim to figure out which I prefer.