ThinWalls
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2014
- Posts
- 633
- Likes
- 103
I don't suppose anyone will know the answer to this (as maybe I'm the only one to consider experimenting to find out - from just pure curiosity as much as anything), but, in case anyone has tried it...
Is there any benefit to going over 2TB, given the constraints of Rockbox and FAT32? Even by a little bit? That is, is there any gain in the ultimate usable post-formatting storage in, say, an iFlash quad with cards 1Tb+512Gb+512Gb+128Gb, compared to just using the first three?
Mainly asking because, after years of repeatedly upgrading ipods as card prices come down, I'm left with some 128Gb cards that there seems to be no way of using in an iflash quad if one is trying to get the maximum capacity out of it. I've made efficient use of the 256Gb cards, with a combo of 1Tb+512Gb+256Gb+256Gb, but the 128gb cards I have now seem a bit redundant, as there's no maths that will let you use them and add up to 2Tb.
Is there any benefit to going over 2TB, given the constraints of Rockbox and FAT32? Even by a little bit? That is, is there any gain in the ultimate usable post-formatting storage in, say, an iFlash quad with cards 1Tb+512Gb+512Gb+128Gb, compared to just using the first three?
Mainly asking because, after years of repeatedly upgrading ipods as card prices come down, I'm left with some 128Gb cards that there seems to be no way of using in an iflash quad if one is trying to get the maximum capacity out of it. I've made efficient use of the 256Gb cards, with a combo of 1Tb+512Gb+256Gb+256Gb, but the 128gb cards I have now seem a bit redundant, as there's no maths that will let you use them and add up to 2Tb.