genclaymore
Headphoneus Supremus
You do realize that's partly because bass is omnidirectional and penetrates the car's body more readily, right?
Yea I know.
You do realize that's partly because bass is omnidirectional and penetrates the car's body more readily, right?
some mids and treble, but not all... Again, if I find the 55's enjoyable, then the sz1000's most likely will be great.... Oh, and I like the 55's for dubstrp and rap. Dubstep is 45% of my library.... And... No. I won't buy the skull crushers. That would be a downgrade from the JVC's, not an upgrade...Why would someone buy a can just massage your head and get a reaction from people, that is stupid. You buy a can because you like the sound signature with the music you listen to. You said you didn't want to sacrifice mids and highs, well the SZ does sacrifice mids and highs, a lot
some mids and treble, but not all... Again, if I find the 55's enjoyable, then the sz1000's most likely will be great.... Oh, and I like the 55's for dubstrp and rap. Dubstep is 45% of my library.... And... No. I won't buy the skull crushers. That would be a downgrade from the JVC's, not an upgrade...
It's not some but quite a lot of detail IMO is lost in comparison to even some much cheaper cans like my $69 Takstars sound more coherent, clear, less congested in the mids and highs
have you tried the skull crushers?some mids and treble, but not all... Again, if I find the 55's enjoyable, then the sz1000's most likely will be great.... Oh, and I like the 55's for dubstrp and rap. Dubstep is 45% of my library.... And... No. I won't buy the skull crushers. That would be a downgrade from the JVC's, not an upgrade...
no... Nor do I want to. I'll stick to k240's for listening and JVC's for head humpinghave you tried the skull crushers?
no... Nor do I want to. I'll stick to k240's for listening and JVC's for head humping
have you tried the skull crushers?