TheGrumpyOldMan
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2012
- Posts
- 504
- Likes
- 51
I tend to think of DSD as the UltraHD/4K of audio, not necessarily in precise spec increase but in spirit: there's gotta be a next new thing: it's expensive, little choice of actual content and in terms of real-world, practical enjoyment not nearly as much an increase as the specs would make you think. And some people will swear by it. Though if anybody walks up close enough to a 4K display, they can actually see the extra detail while it will be much harder even for audiophiles when it comes to DSD compared to a properly mastered, lossless HD (PCM) recording (esp. in light of the difficulty many already seem to have between the highest quality lossy formats and lossless and other similar listening comparisons)
Anyway, the takeaway is that I wouldn't worry too much about DSD for the foreseeable future in light of other factors that actually affect audio quality (like the analogue gain section of a DAC, which for me has always made the biggest difference, even with the same chipset) And in general, any difference in SQ of DACs at a certain level is absolutely minimal compared to the impact of the headphones themselves and their amplification...
(And despite my nick, I'm not a get-off-my-lawn (and let me listen to my vinyl) kinda fella
I do appreciate the technology but the returns are becoming very diminishing indeed)
Anyway, the takeaway is that I wouldn't worry too much about DSD for the foreseeable future in light of other factors that actually affect audio quality (like the analogue gain section of a DAC, which for me has always made the biggest difference, even with the same chipset) And in general, any difference in SQ of DACs at a certain level is absolutely minimal compared to the impact of the headphones themselves and their amplification...
(And despite my nick, I'm not a get-off-my-lawn (and let me listen to my vinyl) kinda fella