Dept_of_Alchemy
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- May 28, 2006
- Posts
- 2,901
- Likes
- 72
Quote:
The M8161 sounds very different than the M8100. The M8161 is closer to warm-neutral while the M8100 has a very nice albeit slightly heavy-handed emphasis on bass frequencies. Might want to make sure to get the tubes with the Mullard shields printed on them, branded Mullards are generally better sounding for whatever reason.
Quote:
I loved the RCA 6AK5 for jazz and classical music although I can hardly hear a difference with the Command version. Whereas the different versions of GE tubes like 5 Star and Mobile Audio all have distinctive sonic characteristics, which is kind of weird but fun to experience.
Originally Posted by JimSmiley /img/forum/go_quote.gif Is there any sonic difference between the Mullard 8100 (EF95) and the Mullard 8161 (EF92). Has anyone compared these? I see some praise for the 8161, but I'd rather not use that tiny jumper with my sausage link fingers. |
The M8161 sounds very different than the M8100. The M8161 is closer to warm-neutral while the M8100 has a very nice albeit slightly heavy-handed emphasis on bass frequencies. Might want to make sure to get the tubes with the Mullard shields printed on them, branded Mullards are generally better sounding for whatever reason.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Penchum /img/forum/go_quote.gif What do you think of them? [RCA Commands] |
I loved the RCA 6AK5 for jazz and classical music although I can hardly hear a difference with the Command version. Whereas the different versions of GE tubes like 5 Star and Mobile Audio all have distinctive sonic characteristics, which is kind of weird but fun to experience.