jackmccabe
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2010
- Posts
- 557
- Likes
- 18
I am sure if you found the lcd-2's lacking treble you could eq them. I am not sure how well this would work but it seems like it should work.
I'm worried. I've had them ten days. Still waiting for the top to open up.
There's nothing about classical that requires more treble; far from it. What seems to be implied is that greater treble energy equals bigger soundstage, which may be true in the sense that the soundstage will initially seem bigger, but what's the point if it's an exaggeration and the treble has other untoward effects?
Acoustic instruments have a very rich and detailed sound which is simply not presented well by the LCD-2. The main problem isn't the soundstage; it's the suppression of detail which makes acoustic instruments sound duller on the LCD-2 than on better headphones such as the HE-6 or SR-007. The LCD-2 sound good on some genres (such as electronica), but they are not well-suited for acoustic music in my experience.
Funny, I agree with you on most of your posts about Stax and electrostats in general. It is surprising to me therefore that our impressions of the LCD-2 are so fundamentally different. I TOTALLY disagree with the above statement. Everything I listen to is acoustic, mostly orchestral or large-scale choral (think Mahler, Bach's B-minor Mass, etc.). In my experience, the LCD-2's are truly natural for all of this, compared to my aural memory of these kinds of events. I grew up with a sister who is an accomplished flutist, formerly first flute for the New Jersey Symphony Orchestra, and a sub for the Metropolitan Opera, and the New York Philharmonic. So I have always had a deep immersion in classical music. To my ears, the LCD-2 gets the harmonic tonality exactly right.
I'm surprised that we hear these things so differently!
But I guess that's another reason why there are so many choices out there.
best,
Frank