Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Sometimes there is no rhyme or reason as to which headphones get endorsed by the head-fi community and which ones don't. Think of how many head-fiers bought Edition7s total, relative to how many have already bought Edition9s.
|
Edition 7 = 1 (me) as far as I know. In recent times, there may be a couple more, but if so, they're pretty quiet about it (i.e., not active posters). I took them to several meets when they were brand spanking new and they sounded absolutely terrible out of the box! This led to all sorts of bad press, and I was as guilty as anyone (more so, really) because I had the opportunity to break them in and give them a real chance, but never bothered with them for the longest time. Thus, there was only 1 real data point, and never a full review by anyone who gave them a complete workout.
Edition 9 = many (or so it seems) but of course this comes after the 2500 and 750 had gained some respect (which keeps growing, by the way). The other ** very important ** factor is that the Edition 9 are half the price of the Edition 7 and yet (from all reports) essentially the same headphone in terms of sonics.
But I do see your point and it is quite well taken. When some good press gets out there, momentum quickly builds. When word travels slowly, or if the first reviews are strongly negative, momentum is killed (especially for high dollar headphones where people don't want to take risks, and understandably so).
BTW, this reminds me that I need to get some thoughts out there concerning the Stax 4070. My initial impressions are that they're quite good indeed! I haven't given them much time yet, and have not compared them to anything, but "soon come" as they say in Cayman.