Jomo Audio Impressions & Discussion Thread
- Thread starter nmatheis
- Start date
iceanddice
100+ Head-Fier
I love the Samba’s but the universal version’s bores are so long so they might not be for everybody. They show up on your ears like frankenstein plugs... small price to pay for their sound though!
Hey guys, I just posted my CanJam SG 2018 article on TheHeadphoneList.com, which you can check out HERE. Below are excerpts from the article detailing my thoughts on Jomo's two new prototypes: Type X and Type Z. Enjoy! 
Jomo Audio
Jomo Audio was one of the three custom IEM brands accompanying Euphoria Audio at their CanJam Singapore debut. Also a Singapore-native, Joseph Mou initially conceived the company after years of experience in the DIY space. Now, with a plethora of world-class products under his belt, Joseph is previewing two prototype IEMs for public feedback: Type X and Type Z. Both units were equipped with three sound bores, so one can assume that they’ll be placed higher up the line at release. Regardless though, both prototypes yielded impressive listens and I can’t wait to see what comes of them a few months down the road.
Jomo Audio Type X: The Type X is undoubtedly one of the most balanced-sounding IEMs out of Jomo’s entire line-up. Tonally evoking the flagship Flamenco, the Type X walks the tightrope between clean technicality and engaging musicality. Its clarity and finesse can be attributed to excellent bidirectional extension, while a rise in the upper-bass and an accentuated centre midrange add a brilliant sense of body without congesting the stage. The Type X has an upper-bass-focused low-end. Like the Flamenco, mid-bass impact is neutrally-inclined, while sub-bass rumble is minimal overall. As a result, the Type X presents a bass that’s tight, well-resolved and well-layered, with just enough punch to signify its presence in the mix.
The Type X presents vocals cleanly – with a focus on articulation – but body never comes across as insufficient. Midrange notes aren’t the largest, but they’re solid, dense and well-resolved. This makes separation and imaging precision more palpable in the long run; trading off pure engagement for a cleaner and more accurate spatial presentation. Treble, alaJomo, is crystalline, well-extended and – most importantly – smooth. A slight rise in the upper-treble enhances clarity and air, but the top-end region as a whole is linear otherwise. This contributes to background blackness and stage stability, ensuring that the Type X’s presentation is consistently defined, constantly easygoing and sufficiently organic. Again, the Type X is tactfully balanced and technically sound. It’s not necessarily a new sound per se for the company, but it’s the Jomo signature done right nonetheless.
Jomo Audio Type Z: The Type Z is a more dynamic, energetic and v-shaped spin on the Type X’s presentation. Immediately, it struck me as a Type X with the “treble-and-bass switches turned up,” so to speak. But, upon further listen, there are certainly inherent differences between the two that expand beyond just boosts in the extremes. Spatially, the Type Z presents music within a slightly larger soundstage. The prototypes perform similarly in imaging precision, but the Type Z is a touch stronger in left-right separation and central focus – possibly a consequence of the extra energy in the upper-treble. The Type Z’s low-end hits harder, with a greater focus in the mid-bass. As a result, the Type X has the edge in bass resolution and layering, but that doesn’t take away from the Type Z’s more musical response. Taken together with its sparkly top-end, you get a more dynamic, impactful and energetic listen.
Because of this, the Type Z’s midrange is the least substantial component in its presentation. Vocals and instruments alike are neutrally-placed, and they sound decidedly laid-back. Like the Type X, midrange notes are on the smaller side, but they excel in precision, separation and layering – yielding a clean and organised soundscape that never feels sluggish. However, listeners accustomed to large and engaging vocals will find the Type Z too nonchalant. Similar to IEMs like the Lime Ears Aether, the Type Z is best enjoyed with dynamic instrumental music where vocals aren’t too big of a priority. Clarity also receives a healthy boost due to the Type Z’s accentuated upper-and-lower-treble, whilst also infusing neutrality into the IEM’s overall timbre. Though, despite these bumps in the top-end, the Type Z maintains smoothness through excellent headroom. The mid-bass emphasis does fill up the stage to some degree, but treble notes sound neither harsh nor compressed; expressed with an openness that’s more akin to the Flamenco than it is to the Samba.
Jomo Audio
Jomo Audio was one of the three custom IEM brands accompanying Euphoria Audio at their CanJam Singapore debut. Also a Singapore-native, Joseph Mou initially conceived the company after years of experience in the DIY space. Now, with a plethora of world-class products under his belt, Joseph is previewing two prototype IEMs for public feedback: Type X and Type Z. Both units were equipped with three sound bores, so one can assume that they’ll be placed higher up the line at release. Regardless though, both prototypes yielded impressive listens and I can’t wait to see what comes of them a few months down the road.
Jomo Audio Type X: The Type X is undoubtedly one of the most balanced-sounding IEMs out of Jomo’s entire line-up. Tonally evoking the flagship Flamenco, the Type X walks the tightrope between clean technicality and engaging musicality. Its clarity and finesse can be attributed to excellent bidirectional extension, while a rise in the upper-bass and an accentuated centre midrange add a brilliant sense of body without congesting the stage. The Type X has an upper-bass-focused low-end. Like the Flamenco, mid-bass impact is neutrally-inclined, while sub-bass rumble is minimal overall. As a result, the Type X presents a bass that’s tight, well-resolved and well-layered, with just enough punch to signify its presence in the mix.
The Type X presents vocals cleanly – with a focus on articulation – but body never comes across as insufficient. Midrange notes aren’t the largest, but they’re solid, dense and well-resolved. This makes separation and imaging precision more palpable in the long run; trading off pure engagement for a cleaner and more accurate spatial presentation. Treble, alaJomo, is crystalline, well-extended and – most importantly – smooth. A slight rise in the upper-treble enhances clarity and air, but the top-end region as a whole is linear otherwise. This contributes to background blackness and stage stability, ensuring that the Type X’s presentation is consistently defined, constantly easygoing and sufficiently organic. Again, the Type X is tactfully balanced and technically sound. It’s not necessarily a new sound per se for the company, but it’s the Jomo signature done right nonetheless.
Jomo Audio Type Z: The Type Z is a more dynamic, energetic and v-shaped spin on the Type X’s presentation. Immediately, it struck me as a Type X with the “treble-and-bass switches turned up,” so to speak. But, upon further listen, there are certainly inherent differences between the two that expand beyond just boosts in the extremes. Spatially, the Type Z presents music within a slightly larger soundstage. The prototypes perform similarly in imaging precision, but the Type Z is a touch stronger in left-right separation and central focus – possibly a consequence of the extra energy in the upper-treble. The Type Z’s low-end hits harder, with a greater focus in the mid-bass. As a result, the Type X has the edge in bass resolution and layering, but that doesn’t take away from the Type Z’s more musical response. Taken together with its sparkly top-end, you get a more dynamic, impactful and energetic listen.
Because of this, the Type Z’s midrange is the least substantial component in its presentation. Vocals and instruments alike are neutrally-placed, and they sound decidedly laid-back. Like the Type X, midrange notes are on the smaller side, but they excel in precision, separation and layering – yielding a clean and organised soundscape that never feels sluggish. However, listeners accustomed to large and engaging vocals will find the Type Z too nonchalant. Similar to IEMs like the Lime Ears Aether, the Type Z is best enjoyed with dynamic instrumental music where vocals aren’t too big of a priority. Clarity also receives a healthy boost due to the Type Z’s accentuated upper-and-lower-treble, whilst also infusing neutrality into the IEM’s overall timbre. Though, despite these bumps in the top-end, the Type Z maintains smoothness through excellent headroom. The mid-bass emphasis does fill up the stage to some degree, but treble notes sound neither harsh nor compressed; expressed with an openness that’s more akin to the Flamenco than it is to the Samba.
My solution for long bores on Samba - one size smaller tips, pushed all the way up to nozzle. This way I get really deep fit, that is much closer to fit of custom version. And they don't look like frankenstein's plugs anymore.
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2010
- Posts
- 7,811
- Likes
- 3,058
And here's another Haka review: https://www.headfonia.com/review-jomo-haka/
I really think it's a good monitor for the price, especially if you choose the basic custom option. Because of its really good price/quality ration, it's been added to our recommended CIEM list as well.
A job well done with this one driver!
I really think it's a good monitor for the price, especially if you choose the basic custom option. Because of its really good price/quality ration, it's been added to our recommended CIEM list as well.
A job well done with this one driver!
HansBarbarossa
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2013
- Posts
- 175
- Likes
- 1,064
Hi, friends! just translation of my review of Jomo HAKA into English
https://www.head-fi.org/showcase/jomo-audio-haka.23068/
https://www.head-fi.org/showcase/jomo-audio-haka.23068/
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2010
- Posts
- 7,811
- Likes
- 3,058
Joseph asked me to post my Model X impressions here as well, this is a universal version with spinfit tips if I'm not mistaken
What I really love is the upper midrange and treble section, there's great clarity and energy and they sound extra good. The overall layering, extension and decay is also good. I do think the bass needs more precision, definition and tightness, and the lower mids and mid mids are bit overly airy making them sound somewhat muffled at times. This especially hits you when you just start listening to them coming from a different monitor, but then after a few minutes you're used to the X's sound however. For me it are mostly the mids that could still be improved, and the bass needs some fine tuning. (listening done with SP1000)
Joseph: Yeah, I agree with you on the bass area. Should be the next thing to work on. I’ve also tried to push the mid range backwards a bit, it bring out bass quantity and sounds cleaner.
I do see why the mids were pushed back a bit but let's see what happens after he's had some time to work on the bass.
To be continued
What I really love is the upper midrange and treble section, there's great clarity and energy and they sound extra good. The overall layering, extension and decay is also good. I do think the bass needs more precision, definition and tightness, and the lower mids and mid mids are bit overly airy making them sound somewhat muffled at times. This especially hits you when you just start listening to them coming from a different monitor, but then after a few minutes you're used to the X's sound however. For me it are mostly the mids that could still be improved, and the bass needs some fine tuning. (listening done with SP1000)
Joseph: Yeah, I agree with you on the bass area. Should be the next thing to work on. I’ve also tried to push the mid range backwards a bit, it bring out bass quantity and sounds cleaner.
I do see why the mids were pushed back a bit but let's see what happens after he's had some time to work on the bass.
To be continued
Any idea where the X stands among the entire Jomo lineup?Joseph asked me to post my Model X impressions here as well, this is a universal version with spinfit tips if I'm not mistaken
What I really love is the upper midrange and treble section, there's great clarity and energy and they sound extra good. The overall layering, extension and decay is also good. I do think the bass needs more precision, definition and tightness, and the lower mids and mid mids are bit overly airy making them sound somewhat muffled at times. This especially hits you when you just start listening to them coming from a different monitor, but then after a few minutes you're used to the X's sound however. For me it are mostly the mids that could still be improved, and the bass needs some fine tuning. (listening done with SP1000)
Joseph: Yeah, I agree with you on the bass area. Should be the next thing to work on. I’ve also tried to push the mid range backwards a bit, it bring out bass quantity and sounds cleaner.
I do see why the mids were pushed back a bit but let's see what happens after he's had some time to work on the bass.
To be continued
HiFlight
Headphoneus Supremus
Looking for some additional impressions of Haka.
Thank you for sharing your analysis of the Model X. I personally view the airiness of a signature as following from the quantity of the bass in relation to the prominence and extension of the treble. Therefore, I did not completely understand what you described with the mids being too airy. I was wondering if you could perhaps elaborate on how the loose bass relates to the airiness of the mids, and how this makes them sound muffled? This will help me to better put your impressions in perspective. Thanks in advance.Joseph asked me to post my Model X impressions here as well, this is a universal version with spinfit tips if I'm not mistaken
What I really love is the upper midrange and treble section, there's great clarity and energy and they sound extra good. The overall layering, extension and decay is also good. I do think the bass needs more precision, definition and tightness, and the lower mids and mid mids are bit overly airy making them sound somewhat muffled at times. This especially hits you when you just start listening to them coming from a different monitor, but then after a few minutes you're used to the X's sound however. For me it are mostly the mids that could still be improved, and the bass needs some fine tuning. (listening done with SP1000)
Joseph: Yeah, I agree with you on the bass area. Should be the next thing to work on. I’ve also tried to push the mid range backwards a bit, it bring out bass quantity and sounds cleaner.
I do see why the mids were pushed back a bit but let's see what happens after he's had some time to work on the bass.
To be continued
Are there any shops where we can just pop in to try out the new/upcoming Jomo IEMs?
Huh...dropped by Euphoria the other day. Was mainly looking to demo the 6R. Was surprised that they only had the 6.
That said I also tried the Samba. Fantastic clarity and detail, definitely one of the most resolving IEMs have heard to date, along with the Empire Legend X that I tried at the same time.
That said I also tried the Samba. Fantastic clarity and detail, definitely one of the most resolving IEMs have heard to date, along with the Empire Legend X that I tried at the same time.
Jomo Audio will be launching several new products at Euphoria Audio as part of their Tune It Singapore! exclusive event. I'll be visiting their headquarters this Saturday to preview all of the new releases; including three new entries into their highly-acclaimed Pro Audio Series, as well as the debut of their Melange Series - comprised entirely of hybrid custom IEMs. I'll be covering the event in a THL article filled with product details, sound impressions and high-definition photos for all you guys to enjoy. But, for now, let's look at the teasers Euphoria Audio have released on their Facebook page:
Users who are viewing this thread
