maricius
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2013
- Posts
- 980
- Likes
- 157
I am sorry to say this, but in terms of audio quality this product is totally overrated. A big disappointment and a reminder to the community - is anyone listening out there at all these days by any chance? Or are we only into numbers ... Wake up!
I'd really have to disagree. If it's such a bad value, then the DX90, AK120, CLAS -dB, and DACport LX are even worse. I loved my DACport. ;-( Oh and I don't really get the numbers issue… I mean they market the DSD512 and Octaetcetera and the Turbo whatever but I just use Normal with IEMatch on "Off" at most on BitPerfect with 16/44.1kHz files.
Hi, how does the idsd micro compare to daps like the x5, dx90 or even the ak100ii in terms of sound quality? I currently own a x3 2nd gen and i'm wondering if the idsd micro would provide an upgrade sq wise while still being somewhat portable.
It's a huge step up compared to my DX90 in terms of dimensionality. The sound is smoother, warmer, and better textured. The soundstage is wider but it's noticeably deeper as if forming an ensemble in front of you whereas the DX90 is more forward and somewhat 2 dimensional sounding. That being said, the DX90 is colder and clearer sounding. Not cleaner but clearer. "Digital" relative to the iDSD as some would say. It sounds good with some headphones but with most, I prefer the iDSD.