kimvictor
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2012
- Posts
- 4,397
- Likes
- 233
Isn't the purpose of Acupass to create an acoustic cut off for bass, just like SE846's true woofers? If so, why do they use it for mid/high drivers?
FitEar parterre uses it too! And so does InEar SD2
Erm afaik acupass is a technology just like TWFK in which 2 drivers are bonded as one unit. Twfk also has many variations in terms of what FR each driver covers so I'm not surprised if Acupass has such variations too
Isn't the purpose of Acupass to create an acoustic cut off for bass, just like SE846's true woofers? If so, why do they use it for mid/high drivers?
These statements are incorrect.
The InEar SD2 uses the Knowles GQ-30783. It is not 100% confirmed that the Parterre uses the 1723, though it's basically true. We have high suspicions that the fitear also uses the 1723 but tuned in a different manner.
As of right now, there aren't too many variations of AcuPass. There is the 1723WT02, which was used in the BA200. There is the 1723WT03 and 1723WT03/9, which are just non-vented and vented variants, respectively, of the same driver assembly. The only real difference is in the bass response.
There are other "AcuPass" variations coming, made from different driver sets apart from the 2300 and 1700, but they have not yet been announced.
In AcuPass, the two drivers are not bonded together. They are held together by a plate. The way the two drivers interact with each other is different from the way the WBFK portion and FK portion of the TWFK interact with other another.
These statements are incorrect.
The InEar SD2 uses the Knowles GQ-30783. It is not 100% confirmed that the Parterre uses the 1723, though it's basically true. We have high suspicions that the fitear also uses the 1723 but tuned in a different manner.
As of right now, there aren't too many variations of AcuPass. There is the 1723WT02, which was used in the BA200. There is the 1723WT03 and 1723WT03/9, which are just non-vented and vented variants, respectively, of the same driver assembly. The only real difference is in the bass response.
There are other "AcuPass" variations coming, made from different driver sets apart from the 2300 and 1700, but they have not yet been announced.
In AcuPass, the two drivers are not bonded together. They are held together by a plate. The way the two drivers interact with each other is different from the way the WBFK portion and FK portion of the TWFK interact with other another.
Yes, but the SE846's acoustic low pass is far more advanced. With each "angle change" in the SE846 low pass, the cutoff gets steeper and steeper, whereas the AcuPass' low pass is just one long thin straight path with a mini-damper applied. With AcuPass, there is still treble resonance that exists within the system, just far less than typical.
I'm planning to get an ultra portable setup that I can stuff into my pocket (DAP+IEM). As for IEM, I'm planning to get either JH Angie or Noble K10.
I'm a bit torn on the DAP. Stuffing extra stuff will make my pocket bulge. If I get something like DX90 or AK100ii, how much of an improvement will I get from just plugging the IEM into LG G3? This DAP is solely for IEM, not for full size headphone.
I'm planning to get an ultra portable setup that I can stuff into my pocket (DAP+IEM). As for IEM, I'm planning to get either JH Angie or Noble K10.
I'm a bit torn on the DAP. Stuffing extra stuff will make my pocket bulge. If I get something like DX90 or AK100ii, how much of an improvement will I get from just plugging the IEM into LG G3? This DAP is solely for IEM, not for full size headphone.
Brick sized player? X5? You kidding right?
Brick sized player is HM901/802 or Lotoo PAW Gold or DX100. X5 is perfectly fine with use in jeans pocket or something. If you wanna say something, you can say it is a tad heavy but it is definitely not a brick sized player.
Ooh, just found this thread.
X5 and Angie.
Just added the new ALO Rx IEM amp.
Great combo!
How is the Angie? I heard mixed impressions of them.