-bass is tighter , leaner and cleaner with he1000se , it is better controlled and feels a little better tuned , drier too .
bass is wetter and penetrating the ambient and dimensions at times with he1000v2stealth , it rarely happens with he1000se , bass is very precise and defined in its space . feels *a little bit deeper with he1000se too at times .
-music is more a 3d envelope with he1000v2stealth , a bubbled universe that wants to grab all your attention "hey I started and I will draw emotions and colors in you " with this or that , in its well defined articulate and expressive partiture
-with he1000se space feels more linear , an open field with lot of air up and invite you to measure distances and reverbs , to let it flow and enjoy it without being in awe ; I wouldn't say it is worse ; it is asking less attention .
-there's no dubt that guitars sound closer and more analogue and more alive with he1000v2stealth , where they're thinner and usually less expanded with their reverbs and distortions with he1000se ; the he1000V2stealth are warmer and more analoguish sounding then the he1000se, I must admit that drums timbre is usually better and voices are less sibiling with them ( eq can do something too but the timbre - at least with these instruments and seemengly for voices too is ultimately and quite noticeably better with he1000V2stealth )
-the level of insights in the recording for both headphones is outstanding , I am picking up faults or mixing oversights I never noticed before , and it's been a time it did not happen.. made a short test and level of resolution seems very close not sure it is different between the two . probably not . I am waiting full burn in as for bass the he1000se seem to offer a better resolve ; for microdetails characterized by high frqs nuances : they're layering different , and tone is different , but that microdetails hard to hear and notice are equally present. although in different layers and timbres . will see and report better in this aspect with more listenings
-dynamics seems slightly better on he1000se . I need more time for this
-layering seems better on he1000se ( but it is a hit and miss as it may be overkill for some genres and tracks where chirurgic layering is not a need... nevertheless I appreciate and dig this value , more then its absence) ; there's definitely more sense of space and air with he1000se whereas there's more diffusion and less emptyness among instruments in the mix with he1000v2stealth
as I already said , the he1000se moves more in a land of classic reference through genres , excelling in some things ( space , dimensions , measures and reference , speed , bass timbre and separation , feeling of air and open space , sure she feels the more electrostatic' alike . Something tells me that scalability goes furher with them then with he1000v2stealth; the he1000v2stealth are a bit of a different beast really , they seem more tuned ( warmer ) , they sound more modern , engaging , more intimate many times , music sounds and whispers and talks closer and wetter ( at the expense of a narrower stage ? someone may say so depending on what he values more on his listening habits ) , also they want more attention too in their presentation and expression ( again , someone may say this is better .. someone other may say he feels better the other way , enjoying the ride without any added fatigue .. )
Thanks for your impressions.
However, one thing that I ALWAYS find extremely helpful in these types of direct comparisons is to pick 2 or 3 specific, but well-known, high quality tracks to compare and contrast between the two headphones/IEMs/speakers, etc.
That helps readers better understand and relate to your findings, because they are more likely to be familiar with the track and its general overall properties. Or you can add a link to it so others can listen for themselves and understand what you are describing.
For instance, you might desribe the differences between the stick attack and then the following decay and sustain of the resonance and harmonics of the ride cymbal in
Patricia Barber's "Nardis" track.
And then you could compare the difference in the vocal presentation, bass, piano, and drum solo, as well as the differences in the dynamics, and imaging/soundstage.
This is just an one EXAMPLE. They could be any genre or style. For instance, how do they compare with a simple acoustic trio track, and how do they differ with a busier, more complex mix, such as
Tears for Fears "Woman in Chains"?
For example,
Woman In Chains, Roland's main vocal should be front and center, but Oleta Adams' background vocal should appear ~1m above and ~2m behind Roland. I find that the imaging/placement of these will vary A LOT between different headphones/IEMs/loudspeakers.
And, the Soundstage in general is EXPANSIVE in both Width AND Depth. There are A LOT of different instruments and elements that should have their own distinct point in space in the soundstage, and they should not appear to be cluttered or muddy/blended together.
And below is one of the Absolute Best tracks I've found to demonstrate the DIFFERENCES in capabilities between any two or more headphones/IEMs/loudspeakers in regards to Tonality, Imaging & Soundstage, Dynamics, Attack & Decay, Midbass & Bass Speed & Detail, and "Room" ambience.
There are just 3 Elements to this track: Piano, Drums, and Electric Bass. But they are each incredibly detailed and extremely revealing. It's a Telarc recording.
It can and will sound VASTLY different depending on the capabilities of each system it is played on, so this is the ONE TRACK that I use that instantly tells me if a system is "there" yet, or not...
I've nicknamed it "The Litmus Test".
Jacques Loussier Trio Plays Bach - Encore! - "Little Fugue in G Minor, BWV 578" (Jazz version)
https://music.apple.com/us/album/little-fugue-in-g-minor-bwv-578-jazz-version/266296301?i=266296307