jerg
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2010
- Posts
- 6,126
- Likes
- 864
Quote:
J$'s are an improvement upon stock Hifimans (both velours and pleathers) in terms of resolution and dynamics, but it does not solve the tonal issues. In other words, the voicing of the HE400 (and to a lesser degree the HE500) is still not optimal with J$s.
The full jergpad mod gets to J$s in terms of most aspects of fidelity, but at the same time significantly attenuates the voicing, so that treble is much fuller and less peaked, and upper midrange is much more up-front and closer to natural levels. It is also much more transparent due to the corrected even voicing.
Jerg,
your comment had me thinking. I received the J$ pads around the time I got the 400 and I did not bother to give the stock pleathers a chance. Thus, I may not have familiarized myself with the strengths, weaknesses and signature of the 400. Is this an issue and should I "downgrade" ? After all, the J$ is a mod (compared to the stock), isn't it ?
J$'s are an improvement upon stock Hifimans (both velours and pleathers) in terms of resolution and dynamics, but it does not solve the tonal issues. In other words, the voicing of the HE400 (and to a lesser degree the HE500) is still not optimal with J$s.
The full jergpad mod gets to J$s in terms of most aspects of fidelity, but at the same time significantly attenuates the voicing, so that treble is much fuller and less peaked, and upper midrange is much more up-front and closer to natural levels. It is also much more transparent due to the corrected even voicing.