- Joined
- Aug 2, 2008
- Posts
- 5,408
- Likes
- 1,327
Beyer T70p CSD Plots
I've been ignoring this thread for a while. Here's new one.
THESE ARE NOT A FREQUENCY RESPONSE GRAPHS. NOTE AXIS RANGES.
This it the T70P, not T70. The T70p sounds as bright as the sun. Also important to note that the above is a CSD plot using measurement methods different from HeadRoom.
Thanks for posting the measurements.
Regarding measurements like that in general: Will it have effect on those measurements if you put different amplifiers in the chain?
Also to my ears the T70 sounds brighter than the T70p. How do you think amplifiers can have effect on how we perceive the T70 vs. the T70p? I think a lot of the synergy between amplifiers and 250 Ohm / 32 Ohm headphones can make a world of difference in how I hear them sounding good or bad. Can such synergies have an effect on measurements like that and are you able to really tell if a headphone is good or bad based on measurements?
opps sorry, didn't see the p there. thanks for the clarification.
btw, do you have any plan for iems measurements in the far future?
It seems Beyer focused on efficiency and distortion with the Tesla line:
http://europe.beyerdynamic.com/press/press-releases/press-detail/article/beyerdynamic-reinvents-headphones-with-tesla-technology-the-borders-of-feasible-technology-are-rea.html
However, one of the main complains about the Beyerdynamic cans is a little too much tremble. I own the DT990 and also feel they are very clean sounding, and like their bass. With some of my music they sound really fine, but with some others they can be a little piercing. I have not tried the Tesla line, but having a flat tremble line option in their portfolio sounds like a good strategy to me.