I have the E2's and will try the suede pads. Any opinions of the HEDD cans?
I own both E2 and Hedds. Similar demands power-/current-wise -- Hedds need a bit more power, E2 more current. They're pretty different sounding though, for both being planars.
Both seem like 'fast' headphones to my ears.
With stock or perforated pads, E2 have more subdued highs -- I'll have to report back regarding E2 w/ suede vs Hedd.
Below the top octave, E2 seem more linear than Hedds, and E2 bass is both more well-defined/controlled and also more extended into sub-bass.
Hedds slam mid-bass more and mids are more prominent.
E2 is more of an all-arounder while Hedds are especially nice with crunchy guitars. Cranberries
Zombie would be a good Hedd track. Also, I mostly prefer Led Zeppelin from Hedds -- a bit more screech from Plant, and Page's guitar screams more -- can seem a bit polite from Ether 2. Emma Ruth Rundle's
Electric Guitar One becomes a tour de force from Hedds. Neil Young's recordings with Crazy Horse (e.g.,
Everybody Knows this is Nowhere, Live Rust) have tremendous 'grit' from Hedds. James Gang
Rides Again is especially nice from Hedd.
On the other hand, there's lots of music where I would prefer Ether 2 for its linearity and excellent 3-d imaging -- most Loreena McKennitt, Ray LaMontagne & Cowboy Junkies are good examples.
Amusing personal history -- I purchased Empyrean a while back (~3 years ago?) and sort of liked them, but basically felt they were 'too far' from my preference for (relatively) neutral/linear/referencey sound. Eventually, I picked up a set of RAD-0 and preferred them, as closer to my tastes, and so sold my Empy. Then, most of year later, picked up a set of Hedds and ended up selling my RAD-0 (to the same guy I bought they from) because the RAD-0 were 'too close' to my other cans and the Hedds gave me a different 'arrow in my quiver'.
Apparently the schizophrenia is strong with this one