[wickson]

headwhacker curious what your typical volume level is paired with the Roxanne?

Thanks

 

[whatisitsci]

Wh

Just put the DX90 I received on Friday up for sale, http://www.head-fi.org/t/715395/ibasso-dx-90, Going to stick with X5.

What's the reason for ditching the dx90? I'm considering both, and I haven't decided yet, so a reason would give me an idea.

Anyone tried both and is able to give a a/b comparison? Would be very much appreciated

The X5 is the other one I was considering also. A comparison would be great.

 

[Sound Eq]

  Just put the DX90 I received on Friday up for sale, http://www.head-fi.org/t/715395/ibasso-dx-90, Going to stick with X5.

can i ask why u chose the x5 over the dx 90
 
how does the sound compare to u, which has better bass and warmth

 

[headwhacker]

headwhacker curious what your typical volume level is paired with the Roxanne?

Thanks

210 - 220

 

[goodvibes]

  can i ask why u chose the x5 over the dx 90
 
how does the sound compare to u, which has better bass and warmth

The x5 has more warmth and apparent bass but I would argue the DX90 has a more correct presentation of the range. Just IMO. His opinion is obviously different.

 

[ClassicalViola]

Hi, does anyone know if the OTG function of the DX90 will allow me to use this with it: (?)
 
http://www.kingston.com/en/support/technical/otg_compatibility
 
I've searched the thread and don't seem to see any info on this. Any info would be appreciated, thanks! 

 

[Solude]

  The x5 has more warmth and apparent bass but I would argue the DX90 has a more correct presentation of the range.

 
Traditional BB v ESS signature differences.

 

[TokenGesture]

The DX90 is ultra detailed - its like music at an atomic level. Some people may find it too detailed - ie to the expense of the 'musicality' of the music. 

 

[Sound Eq]

ok let me ask it this way which has more low bass and mid punch the x5 or dx90

 

[CosmicHolyGhost]

  The x5 has more warmth and apparent bass but I would argue the DX90 has a more correct presentation of the range. Just IMO. His opinion is obviously different.

If I recall correctly, you listened to the X5 for like 5 minutes and then passed on to the next reviewer. I remember because I thought you purchased one and asked you why you would purchase one but would not listen to it. At the same time, I have observed that you seem to be very conclusive of how "incorrect" or "bad" X5 sounds.... just saying.. maybe you have really good ears...

 

[musicheaven]

The X5 excels in the mid and highs, the DX90 in bass extension, contrary to others who said the X5 has more bass, I found it to have less. The X5 feels somewhat laid back in the bass but more analytic at higher frequencies while the DX90 is wide, extended in the bass, crisp and crystal clear in higher frequencies. Talk about two different daps, the dual dacs definitively makes a big difference. It's pretty clear we all have different impressions between the two players. Always the best is to experience it yourself until you do it will be hard to take one side versus the other. Just look at owners who had both, they made their own choices according to their taste in perceived sq and signature that they felt comfortable with.

 

[CosmicHolyGhost]

The X5 excels in the mid and highs, the DX90 in bass extension, contrary to others who said the X5 has more bass, I found it to have less. The X5 feels somewhat laid back in the bass but more analytic at higher frequencies

Hi Jon, I agree to your comment regarding the X5 in the bass department. Sorry, I have not had chance to audition the DX90 yet. Maybe I will buy one later on after I have purchase more silly things first.

 

[viet1357911]

The X5 excels in the mid and highs, the DX90 in bass extension, contrary to others who said the X5 has more bass, I found it to have less. The X5 feels somewhat laid back in the bass but more analytic at higher frequencies while the DX90 is wide, extended in the bass, crisp and crystal clear in higher frequencies. Talk about two different daps, the dual dacs definitively makes a big difference. It's pretty clear we all have different impressions between the two players. Always the best is to experience it yourself until you do it will be hard to take one side versus the other. Just look at owners who had both, they made their own choices according to their taste in perceived sq and signature that they felt comfortable with.

Ya may be u right i found X5 more analytic. DX90's wider but X5's deeper 

 

[musicheaven]

Hi Jon, I agree to your comment regarding the X5 in the bass department. Sorry, I have not had chance to audition the DX90 yet. Maybe I will buy one later on after I have purchase more silly things first.

Understood, it's getting tough following new stuff, expensive and time consuming too. I couldn't help myself but had to quench my curiosity about the DX90 and therefore took a dive. You're lucky being able to sample daps, wish I could do that, it would make my buying a lot easier or maybe not.

Have fun but be careful about the wallet.

Ya may be u right i found X5 more analytic. DX90's wider but X5's deeper 

It seems to be the consensus or is it? :tongue_smile:

 

[viet1357911]

It seems to be the consensus or is it?

I cant undestand why some ppl say DX90''s mid laid back, i feel it throw in the face and unnatural.... X5 sure more detail and neutral... Like i said Dx90 is wider but X5 is deeper. It's like my Re400 and Re600, 400's wider but 600's deeper...