The Headamp GS-X Mini looks promising, it's also bigger than my A90 Discreet.
I really liked how the gsx-mini sounded with the Aeon 2 Noire and Aeon 2 Open BTW. Haven't tried that with Stealth though
The Headamp GS-X Mini looks promising, it's also bigger than my A90 Discreet.
I'd see if you can borrow one first, given the cost, especially since the resolution of your DAC may be a limiting factor in getting any significant improvement. However, (and I mean this as an observation, not an attack) I think that you're so attached to your biases that, no matter how much better any other amp or DAC actually is you will hear whatever it is you believe you will when you try anything more expensive, so I'd just stick to your Topping devices and be done with it.So I'll trust you over everyone else because you're REALLY convinced you're right and order a GS-X Mini to compare against my A90 Discreet using my DCA Stealth.
Maybe everyone else is wrong?
I'd see if you can borrow one first, given the cost, especially since the resolution of your DAC may be a limiting factor in getting any significant improvement. However, (and I mean this as an observation, not an attack) I think that you're so attached to your biases that, no matter how much better any other amp or DAC actually is you will hear whatever it is you believe you will when you try anything more expensive, so I'd just stick to your Topping devices and be done with it.
There's much I could also address in your post, but as every time Topping and SMSL release products, the number of zeros on their THD numbers seem to fluctuate from day-to-day (not kidding here, they pad the zeros, after which APOS and HiFiGo have to change the images to remove the blatant errors), the measurements we see don't show the analyser settings most of the time, and it's trivially easy to tweak settings to make things look better or worse, the dishonesty is not where you think it is.
Well....first step is to get out of using a PC as a transport. It's the #1 reason most ppl don't hear a difference when changing other stuff down the chain.It's not that I'm biased, it's that I have experience that matches what pretty much everyone not on Head-fi has also experienced. I've even performed *banned sciency thing* with others to confirm. My willingness to be wrong should be apparent by how much I've spent and how many DACs and amps I've owned. I don't even want to be right. I do wish there was a DAC, amp, or even headphone cable or magic rock that could improve sound in some way.
And why is that? I'm an engineer and need to understand things or at least determine that they're plausible before I'll put some faith in it.Well....first step is to get out of using a PC as a transport. It's the #1 reason most ppl don't hear a difference when changing other stuff down the chain.![]()
Transport is always king. Yet no one invests in one.And why is that?
Transport is always king. Yet no one invests in one.
Well....first step is to get out of using a PC as a transport. It's the #1 reason most ppl don't hear a difference when changing other stuff down the chain.![]()
Most measurements by YT personalities exists just to shoot down competitors when such metrics has ZERO correlation to SQ.For different folks, zeros and ones are transferred perfectly from whatever source to DAC as shown by their J-test and as such all streamers that have OXCO reclocker or have overengineered power supplies are you already know the term of course. I've experienced just getting rid of PC directly from the chain to elevate a NOS DAC's sonics pretty noticeably even if the Jitter test shows spikes way down low to -120 dBFS on an analyzer when A/Bed a streamer vs a laptop direct
"ZERO correlation to SQ"Most measurements by YT personalities exists just to shoot down competitors when such metrics has ZERO correlation to SQ.
Can you read what I said? Measurements by YT personalities...Can you read thread of this topic?
Well... SD cards all do sound different but ECC is not part of the solution in my tests. Rather a minimum of 110mbps helps and formating and cluster size is the factor that changes SQ. ECC will possibly worsen the sound actually due to extra processing but maybe that card in particular does have some SQ benefits.
Gotta fix that!Oh, and any multi thousand dollar DAC that is susceptible to any form of USB / optical input issues (assuming that they are possible) is also a piece of garbage that doesn't deserve its asking price.