Ok, so if the A90 leaves out low-level signals that would be audible on a different amplifier, then I should be able to reduce the input signal to a point where the sound suddenly cuts out.
I attempted this and I heard no such cutoff. It continued to decrease until ambient noise overpowered it.
Thinking logically about this, I would expect the amplifier to be able to produce a signal so low that it won't be able to move the headphone drivers.
Then I though of a different test.
I set the Windows volume control to 1/100 and my software volume control to 1/100.
This represents an extremely low level signal, far below what is audible.
I then switched the A90 up to high gain and 100 volume and I could just barely hear it.
So either I don't understand what you mean or you're making stuff up.
Low level information isn’t about dynamic range (i.e. turning down the volume of the signal until noise takes over), it’s about hearing every nuance of the recording that gives you realistic illusion of the recoding (in layman’s terms as if you’re truly transported there). Tubes are one of the cheapest ways to get to that level of sound reproduction though an extremely overengineered SS amp that will cost much more than tubes can do the same or better with better overall dynamics at high SPLs. This is just referring to headphone amplifier and not speaker amplifier