FangJoker
Previously known as "vegasf1"
I would like to know how far does the Z1R exceed the IER-M9? Sadly, I could not afford the Z1R.
I am curious why the Z1R is defined as Mild V-shape but the M9 is defined as neutral. From what I read, the Z1R mids are a little bit more forward than the M9.
By the way, why the Solaris is listed in Tier A on your website? I thought at first it was in A+.
People have said that the z1r has really good sub bass and detailed and sparkly treble, making it a mild V or U shape. And it's also been said by many that the mids are not the star of the show so I doubt they are more forward than the M9. I haven't heard either but I'm looking at both and from all of the reviews, that seems to be the consensus. Hopefully someone who has heard both extensively can give you a definite answer.
Read the solaris thread. While there are a few that worship the ground that Ken Ball walks on, there are others that have heard AND TESTED the solaris and there could be a quality control issue with channel matching and the refusal of releasing an official graph just seems odd to me. I don't buy the why should he post a graph because other companies will steal it. Anyone can buy one and test it. And if there was a perfect graph, then everyone would be tuning for the same sound signature. KB just seems shady to me plus I have not enjoyed any of the 3 CFA IEMs that I've bought in the past. So before I buy another, I would definitely have to audition them and where I live, it's not easy.
Also, do you have amazon prime and the amazon credit card? You can do 12 month 0% financing on it according to the amazon page.
Last edited: