bukumurah
100+ Head-Fier
Which is exactly why price and cosmetics are never good indicators of sound quality..
I have heard both.. the MH755 will win by a significant margin.. they are not the best of the best in many technical aspects but the MH755 are also hard to fault.. so as I said, just not the best of the best, for example when talking about imaging and resolution, the qdc VX will be many levels above the MH755.. or when talking about staging, sony's own Z1R will be much larger in all directions than the MH755.. but the MH755 on their own are excellent iems nevertheless..
The CFA Vega on the other hand, are also not bad.. quite fun to listen to, lots of bass, which sometimes bleeds into the midrange, and clouds the clarity of the upper frequencies.. still if someone bought a pair of iems for a thousand bucks, that person has to somehow convince him/herself that it is a good buy, right?
FYI, my reference iems are the PP8
I have heard both.. the MH755 will win by a significant margin.. they are not the best of the best in many technical aspects but the MH755 are also hard to fault.. so as I said, just not the best of the best, for example when talking about imaging and resolution, the qdc VX will be many levels above the MH755.. or when talking about staging, sony's own Z1R will be much larger in all directions than the MH755.. but the MH755 on their own are excellent iems nevertheless..
The CFA Vega on the other hand, are also not bad.. quite fun to listen to, lots of bass, which sometimes bleeds into the midrange, and clouds the clarity of the upper frequencies.. still if someone bought a pair of iems for a thousand bucks, that person has to somehow convince him/herself that it is a good buy, right?
FYI, my reference iems are the PP8
Last edited: