audionewbi
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2010
- Posts
- 10,642
- Likes
- 6,073
I think the fx850.
oh ok thanks, is it really good?I think the fx850.
rudi0504
Since you own both perhaps you could say which i better in terms of absolute SQ between the Hugo and AK240.. I have read some impressions which indicate the difference is negligible.
Is this correct ? What do you think. If you wanted to buy one and only one unit ignoring the portability factor which would it be for use with IEMs ?
I have some problems with my HUGO,whether I roll up or down the volume turns to the white color,how can i solve this problem?
I have some problems with my HUGO,whether I roll up or down the volume turns to the white color,how can i solve this problem?
Sorry to hear about your problem. Never encountered this before. When you turn the device on, what colour is the volume knob? And does the volume go up and down when you turn the knob?
When i turn the device on,it is green colour ,the volume goes up whether i roll up or down
Green when switched on is the correct colour. But the colour should change (from pink for low volume to white for high volume) as you turn the volume knob. I think you may have to send your Hugo back to the agent or shop for servicing. Not much choice here.
Has anyone noticed the tech spec on Chord website?
I am no expert here but I think there might be some issues.
In the interview video with John Franks in Japan he claimed the total hormonic distortion was 140dB.
But on their website:
• THD – 1KHz 3V output: 0.0005%
• Dynamic Range: 120dB
• Output impedance: 0.075 ohms
• Damping factor >100
Does the output 0.0005% means THD here? If so, I googled it and found it's equivalent to 106dB.
Well I don't care either coz I don't own one.
If the info on the internet are inconsistent, someone might think it's kinda cheating.
I just watched the interview again and realised he clearly said SNR is 140dB not THD.
So the info given in this post is a little bit misleading. http://www.head-fi.org/t/698455/chord-hugo-preview-report
I really don't think that your criticism is valid, especially as you've stated that you don't care about this alleged 'inconsistency', which beggars the question why draw attention to it in the first place?!?