- Joined
- Oct 6, 2013
- Posts
- 15,517
- Likes
- 49,560
Doesn't the CKR9/9LTD/10 share at least more similarities than to the IM1/2/3/4 series to distinguish them besides design/fit?
It's really hard to chose either series right now, let alone the exact model. They must have had a different target market in mind when they releases these two line-ups, which even compete against each other in a similar price category.
Thanks for the help!
Though there is a lot of overlap between latest multi-BA-driver and multi-Dynamic-driver IEMs, they are still very unique in the tuning, and AT marketing does a good job to make your decision hard so people end up buying their multiple IEMs to cover all the basis
I have IM50, IM03 (IM02 was returned), and CKR10 (CKR9 was returned). They all serve their purpose. IM50 sounds great, well built, relatively cheap, has removable cables, and excellent when you working out to get your pumping with a punchy beat and clear smooth vocals. IM03 steps up with a more detailed sound, better soundstage, less aggressive and smoother. CKR10 is warm and organic with a full body sound, more bass and better treble "hi-res" extension. If removable cable is a deciding factor for you, IM50/IM03 has one (the same connector type), while CKR series doesn't. If you wear glasses and can't have over-ear wire, CKR will suit you better with a wire down design. There are also some trade offs with IM series housing getting bigger in size with additional drivers, unlike something like Westone W/UMPro series staying the same with additional drivers. And so on...