SpeakerBox
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2013
- Posts
- 2,320
- Likes
- 1,338
Yes, the build quality of the 1250 certainly speaks to its potential post restoration.
You sir are Pioneer of audio downgrade!!
If for good-looking, Setton RS-660 would be French Chick, and Marantz has blue lights..............
???
Anyway, this would be for a second system, not replacing the Spec 1/2 rack.
Oh, I just wanted to say that receivers might not sound better than your SPEC (IMHO, no receiver will).
If you plan a second system, then it's different game.
Edit,
I should say "within same brand", otherwise, I am just trolling.
Anyway, this would be for a second system, not replacing the Spec 1/2 rack.
Based on his description, Rob's 1280 was more than just restored as many crucial components were also upgraded from the stock components. It is really almost "upgrade"!
As such it could sound even better than new. This is what makes it so hard to compare 40 year old components - none sound stock and the differences have as much to do with age and condition as design and quality.
Just picked up my first original Sony ES receiver, an STR 6055. She seems to be in pristine condition. Photos and impressions to come.
Just picked up my first original Sony ES receiver, an STR 6055. She seems to be in pristine condition. Photos and impressions to come.
Just picked up my first original Sony ES receiver, an STR 6055. She seems to be in pristine condition. Photos and impressions to come.
Kenwood Basic series, dual monaural circuitry sharing a big trannie, great sound, dirt cheap usually under $200. I paid $70 for mine , best bang for the buck out there, people see 'Basic' and think it's crappy lower end stuff, trust me Chad, they ain't, mine drove my Martin Logans without breaking a sweat to very high levels, they should have no problem with your KEF 103.5's
Made a cool find at the local flea market, a Kenwood Basic M2A. Paid $80, talked him down from $120.
It's in almost perfect condition, very clean. I didn't know the specs, but it weighs a ton (~40lbs) so I figured it had some power... 220W /ch into 8ohms (350W /ch into 4). Wow.The 1/4" headphone out puts out up to 6000mW! Other good numbers too:
THD: < .004%
Damping factor: > 1000
Signal to noise ratio: 120dB
Gonna see how it sounds, provided it doesn't blow up my cans.I'll start with the Q701s, they're the toughest to drive headphones that I own.
This M2A is a monster, it drives headphones with authority. Turning the gain knobs a little past 9 o'clock is as far as I can go with my Q701s before I risk hearing damage. There's deep black background, neutrality, and no coloration at all, just brute force. I have no doubt it would grab cans like the HE-6 by the scruff of the neck and make them do what it wants. I'm sure it would look at amps like the Darkstar and Lyr and say, "well, that's cute, let me show you something".
I remember your review. I would have liked a 6120, 6060, or 6065 but this was too good a deal to pass up.Nice! I have the 6065, and I think it's the best sounding receiver under 1k. Great build quality, great sound, great features.
So I have been following auctions on ebay. There is one for BuyItNow for $250+$50 shipping, which then represents the ceiling for other auctions. SalvationArmy sold one for about $235. I forgot to bid on one with broken meters (don't care about that), and then by searching on ebay, I came across someone selling a big stack of 90s crap Kenwood stuff and including an unrelated M2A, but without power cord. Perhaps the missing power cord made some people uneasy, or else they thought that close to a dozen pieces of gear would go for way more money than they wanted to pay, but I ended up with it for about $110 and then told the seller they could keep everything except the M2A, in order to keep the shipping down. (By the way, zzounds musician store shipped the power cable the next day, great service, good prices.)
It arrived yesterday, and the input level controls were just noise city. I deoxited them overnight, and today the controls are like new.
My current headphones are both planars - Mad Dog 3.2 and HE-400 - and they both have a lot more impact and dynamics using the M2A. There is a hair more air and refinement with the tube hybrid amp, but the "coherence" of the M2A is excellent (i.e. every part of the sound seems integrated with every other part). There is a tiny bit of "Japanese high frequency shrillness", but much less than I expected - it is only there on occasion. The HE-400 sound significantly better than they ever have, so they are more like the HE-6 than people think - I expect that most HE-400 buyers have very little money and so tend to use FiiO and so forth. The Mad Dog sound great out of my laptop, so even though they like having power, they don't need it as much as the HiFiMan.
The next tests are speakers, and then a shootout with the Sansui AU-417 which just arrived back...