tuahogary
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2010
- Posts
- 395
- Likes
- 16
Hello again guys, so I bought the Panasonic HJE900 from Amazon for a discount and got them last Thursday. Out of the box they sounded quite bad, harsh treble and very very sibilant. I let them burn in over the weekend for about 15-20 hours and now the treble has tamed down and it sounds more mature.
I must say I was a little skeptical of it partly because of the not so flattering Headfonia review and its sound out of the box. But now that it has burnt in, I am somewhat surprised at the timbre of these Panas. The electric guitars and bass guitars sounded more... "electric", crunchy and real. Compared to my W3, it totally blew them away! I never really noticed the timbre on the W3 until I compared them with the HJE900. I know I shouldn't quantify timbre but if I say the HJE900 sounds 90% real, the W3 only manages a mere 40% on the same scale. W3 sounds a lot more "plastic" and synthetic. Keep in mind that I have only really tested the timbre of electric guitars / bass. I cannot say much about vocals and acoustic instruments yet.
The HJE900 sounds closer to like if I put my ears beside the amp that is plugged into the guitar and in comparison, W3 just sounds wrong. That isn't to say the HJE900 is better though. The W3 does almost everything else better, especially detail retrieval. Even though the HJE900 sounds more edgy and W3 rounded in comparison (W3 are actually quite aggressive compared to other IEMs), the W3 seems to be able to present small details more effortlessly.
I have to say big thanks to the people who have contributed in this thread. I've never heard of the HJE900 before and it seems to be a little gem that has been overlooked in this forum most of the time. I'm hoping to try other IEMs too, and maybe if I come across a deal with the FX700 and EX1000, I'll snap them up as well
I must say I was a little skeptical of it partly because of the not so flattering Headfonia review and its sound out of the box. But now that it has burnt in, I am somewhat surprised at the timbre of these Panas. The electric guitars and bass guitars sounded more... "electric", crunchy and real. Compared to my W3, it totally blew them away! I never really noticed the timbre on the W3 until I compared them with the HJE900. I know I shouldn't quantify timbre but if I say the HJE900 sounds 90% real, the W3 only manages a mere 40% on the same scale. W3 sounds a lot more "plastic" and synthetic. Keep in mind that I have only really tested the timbre of electric guitars / bass. I cannot say much about vocals and acoustic instruments yet.
The HJE900 sounds closer to like if I put my ears beside the amp that is plugged into the guitar and in comparison, W3 just sounds wrong. That isn't to say the HJE900 is better though. The W3 does almost everything else better, especially detail retrieval. Even though the HJE900 sounds more edgy and W3 rounded in comparison (W3 are actually quite aggressive compared to other IEMs), the W3 seems to be able to present small details more effortlessly.
I have to say big thanks to the people who have contributed in this thread. I've never heard of the HJE900 before and it seems to be a little gem that has been overlooked in this forum most of the time. I'm hoping to try other IEMs too, and maybe if I come across a deal with the FX700 and EX1000, I'll snap them up as well