Quote:
cuz u can hear through the paper walls in my apartment building.
Well if it really is that bad then maybe you should only look at closed or IEM's.
Quote:
yea i know open are different but better? some might say if it lacks punch it is not better, other might say that if it lack sound stage and spacing then its also not as good.,
http://headphones.com.au/blog/open-vs-closed-headphones
There's heaps other doco on the net.... CBF'd
Quote:
u are right about the interference, however i had th 6000 and they did suffer from interference but it wasnt unbearable by any means. the micro always would shut them down that same as 180?
Doubt it... if it loses signal it losses it entirely, no hissing, it just drops....
Only ever experienced this when going out of range, haven't yet seen anything "interfere" with it as such.
Quote:
also how much does 180 weigh? are they awkward?
Dunno, should be on senn. website.
They're very comfortable IMO.
Quote:
so are the 170 really closed and the 180 open, has anyone a/b those 2 what are the +-
170 closed, 180 open, confirmed when I conversed
in-depth with Sennheiser Germany.
In short.....
I was told if their simulated surround doesn't appeal, and my env. isn't overly noisy, then the 180 is superior "full-stop".
And it already has decent bass, so you won't miss the "bass boost"...
In simplest terms this is what I was told, unfortunately I don't have both for A/B testing*
*edit*
Someone here has both, and thus far substantiates much of what I've said...
http://www.head-fi.org/forum/thread/443740/sennheiser-rs160-170-180-anyone/105?utm_campaign=subscription&utm_source=subscription_digest&utm_medium=email#post_6939352
*This often opens a new can of worms anyway...
As everyone's hearing is different; so what sounds awesome to me, may sound average to you.