I have to say, the Martin Audio ES10 looks amazing, I've been waiting a long time for a wooden cup mod.
The wooden cups are not just there for cool effect. It makes the bass more "believable" and also causes the sound to get a bit more sweetened.
That is why I only suggested "HALF" the pad so you have and angled effect, not a proximity/distance effect.
The sound should not change much in tonality, rather only in soundstage cues.
Also the Continental is very good but I keep wondering if version2 is better for es10 while version 3 is better for esw11.. Ha
I found a way to simulate a v3 with the v2: just double-amp it with the C&C BH. The low bass boost and sound field boost of the C&C BH causes precisely what one would want: treble + low bass boost.
Anyhow... thanks for your cues on the ESW11 pads!
Since the ESW11 already had its own review, I figure I'll put this in the ES10 thread: a comparison between the stock ES10, ESW9, and ESW11 ear pads.
Thickness-wise, it goes like this:
ES10 < ESW9 < ESW11
Comfort-wise, I think:
ES10 < ESW9 = ESW11
And looks-wise (if you care about this), I think:
ES10 < ESW9 < ESW11
So that that's out of the way, on to sound quality:
Bass: ES10 ear pads sound dull and boomy. ESW9 ear pads sound tighter and more controlled, but also more thin (not "full") and concentrated on the center rather than spread out equally. ESW11 ear pads have very spacious, "subwoofer"-like bass, but due to it having superior seal than both ES10 and ESW9, I think bass can get over-whelming at times. I think ESW9 ear pads are better for those who want to reduce bass quantity, and ESW11 ear pads are good for those who are looking for DAT BASS.
Midrange: ESW11 ear pads have the best mid. ESW9 ear pads have the clearest mid. ES10 ear pads should be thrown aside where this is concerned. ESW11 sounds sweet, full, smooth, lush, and romantic. ESW9 has clearer mid with more upper midrange and is also equally smooth compared to ESW11, but it sounds grainy at higher volumes, and thus doesn't score well with me. ES10 sounds flat, withdrawn, and a little drowned out.
Treble: ES10 ear pads have a very apparent and abrupt roll-off. ESW11 ear pads don't sound as abrupt or closed-in, but the drop in treble extension is still very apparent. ESW9 ear pads sound unbelievably open compared to the other two. Treble extends way past the sky, and clarity is just unbelievable.
Soundstage: ES10 ear pads have the smallest soundstage of the trio, followed by ESW11. To be fair, ESW11 has wider soundstage, but because of the treble roll-off, depth and air isn't as impressive. ESW9, on the other hand, has a more coherent soundstage that's decently wide but with excellent depth and air. Separation is as good as it can get.
Imaging: ES10 ear pads sound confusing, muddled, and somewhat congested. ESW9 and ESW11 ear pads are on par here, on the other hand.
So with that said, I think ESW9 ear pads are best for those looking to turn the ES10 into a more balanced listening experience. And the ESW11 ear pads are best for rolling off that aggressiveness + introduce a more romantic and relaxed listening experience. Both have their own uses.
I personally prefer the ESW9 ear pads by just a very slight smidgen margin, because it turns my ES10 into a versatile little beast. But if I was homing in on relaxed jazz sessions, and I don't have an amplifier handy, I'd grab the ESW11 ear pads instead.
----
Edit: decided to put the ESW11 ear pads up for sale:
ATH-ESW11LTD ear pads (HP-ESW11)
Reason is as I stated above: I think I prefer the brighter and more balanced presentation of the ESW9 ear pads overall. Admittedly, the ESW9 ear pads can get fatiguing pretty fast, but I pretty much don't use my ES10 as a portable headphone much these days, so that's fine.