[potkettleblack]

Sorry, I thought you were basing this on your ears not response graphs.
 
Thanks for your detailed explanation though. You're now free to carry on with your day.

 

[TMRaven]

I am basing this on my ears.  I've had the pleasure of auditioning or owning the entire LCD line.

 

[potkettleblack]

Cool. I'm also basing it on my mine. They're very neutral to me and many others.
I've also had that pleasure.

 

[johnkkraus]

I just tested, and purchased the WOO WA7 for my LCD-X headphones, and will be returning the Audeze Deckard. Just about every comment made, particularly in reference to harshness in the highs, disappeared listening through the WA7. So those comments do apply to my ears experience the LCD-X and Audeze Deckard. For me there's too much sparkle in the Deckard, it's too up front. The entire quality of sound felt lusher, more defined, with the Woo. 
 
For all I know the Deckard could be great for someone looking for more brightness using other Audeze Headphone models.

 

[JimmyJohns99]

Well i just got the lcd-x today and the highs seem totally recessed and bass is boomy, so go figure. I auditioned them on a broken in pair/diff amp a couple days ago and they werent nearly this concealed. Totally different sound. I assume its because these only have 3 hours break in? 

 

[johnkkraus]

I'm just a newbie, but from recent experience with the LCD-X break-in matters, the DAC/AMP matters, cables matter to some extent. Give it some time, for sure. FWIW. 

 

[TMRaven]

It will probably sound the same.  When I got my LCD-X I was shocked at how it sounded (even though it still sounds very good.), so I kept listening to them for hours and hours and eventually even sent them back to Audeze to get RMA'd.  Got them back and they still sounded the same.

 

[JimmyJohns99]

  It will probably sound the same.  When I got my LCD-X I was shocked at how it sounded (even though it still sounds very good.), so I kept listening to them for hours and hours and eventually even sent them back to Audeze to get RMA'd.  Got them back and they still sounded the same.

in the past week ive demo'd every single LCD model and none of them were as veiled and "all mids/lows" as this new pair 

 

[preproman]

  I am basing this on my ears.  I've had the pleasure of auditioning or owning the entire LCD line.

LCD-3F as well?

 

[agooh]

I've been using my lcd 3F for more than 6 months, I love the sound so much,I want to help Audeze improve the sound further more . My question is what's the weakest points in the sound of lcd 3 you wish they improve them !! maybe this is not the best way..
but for me :
1- The weight I hope they can make a thinner diaphragm like the he1000.
2- the treble area sound smooth and wonderful but they need to extended  so it can produce the best detail in this area .
 
Thanks for Audeze I hope we see more high end products .

 

[preproman]

They're suppose to be making a new headband to fit on the LCDs IIRC..  This should distribute the weight and make them lighter.  

 

[JimmyJohns99]

  They're suppose to be making a new headband to fit on the LCDs IIRC..  This should distribute the weight and make them lighter.  

Do you all think this would be able to be retrofitted?

 

[TMRaven]

 
LCD-3F as well?

No, the 2 and 3 I heard were pre-fazor, I guess for the better good as well.  According to some ears I trust, the Fazor'd ones I would not want to mess with.

 

[preproman]

Maybe.  They're all a crap shoot.  I happened to like the Fazors wayyyy better than all the Classics..

 

[hotreks]

Hey Ill buy soon LCD3, do you know if it will be well driven by iBasso DX90? Thanks