Thanks for your thoughts. Does sound like we reached a similar crossroads.
C3R has dual DAC implementation whereas the performance was single. There are other differences including power output etc.
I was hesitant about the of ESS dac in C3R and my gut feeling was right. There isn’t much in it though tbh and Burson have done a great job.
I have been “this” close to pushing the button on Burson Conductor 3X GT but the dac doesn’t interest me and it has a compromised amp section compared with Soloist GT.
I have been recommended a number of options including Qutest, CMA Fifteen, Pathos Aurium, Ferrum Oor, V850, V590,V281, Bifrost 2, Yggy, Rangarok 2, and a few others I can’t remember right now.
One thing I have noticed in the past few days is that C3R really can stretch its legs and get LCD-3 going well with increased volume. I bet the feeling running my Alpha Primes at volume 40-45 for a few hours has helped to improve C3R.
When I went back to lcd-3 I pushed volume up to higher levels and rather than outright volume increase, it was more the soundstage felt more complete. I guess the power and current that lcd-3 demand was being close to met for the first time. This has caused the treble fatigue that I hate which is why C3R isn’t right for me.
It sounds like you’re really enjoying your rig which is awesome and I’m really pleased for you.
I have heard people say that the Qutest is analytical and Pathos Aurium is vs other tube amps.
I do prefer tube amps in general though don’t want to wait for them to warm up. Solid state just don’t sound as good in general (subjective opinion).
I’ll read up further on the Oor. The bass on C3R can hit hard but it’s very dependent on the track. I think the music I listen to has always been a challenge to get the right gear in place.
Thanks for your input!