Will keep an eye here. This looks promising, at least as a big shake on the market.
Latest Thread Images
Featured Sponsor Listings
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Audeze Euclid Closed-Back Planar IEM
- Thread starter Audeze
- Start date
-
- Tags
- audeze iem planar planar magnetic
seanwee
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2015
- Posts
- 4,872
- Likes
- 3,492
Any iem can do that, it's more dependent on the source and the music file you're playing (16bit is 96db, 24bit is 144db). They can count negative db into the 120db figure so it's meaningless to begin with.What's the point of 120 db dynamic range, wouldn't that give you hearing loss instantly?
Just your typical marketing bs, nothing new here.
m̶a̶r̶k̶e̶t̶Will keep an eye here. This looks promising, at least as a big shake 8on the market.
wallet
Quote:
The Audeze Euclid is the company's debut closed-back IEM featuring 18-mm planar magnetic transducers with Fazor phase management. It is priced at $1299.
Source
Last edited:
SilverEars
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2013
- Posts
- 15,798
- Likes
- 7,302
No kidding. Tuning totally sucked even with cipher. Reveal and cipher was placebo as it seemed like there no real consistency with their driver responses. If one to actually see the measurement results of their EQ, it shows that their EQ doesn't really correct the bad driver tunings.Hopefully these are actually usable without any EQ or cipher. The isines and LCD-i were abominations.
I just saw Crin's measurements, it's another odd tuning. Or lack there of.
Last edited:
seanwee
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2015
- Posts
- 4,872
- Likes
- 3,492
Looks much better than its predecessors to me, that huge treble void leaves a lot to be desired though.No kidding. Tuning totally sucked even with cipher. Reveal and cipher was placebo as it seemed like there no real consistency with their driver responses. If one to actually see the measurement results of their EQ, it shows that their EQ doesn't really correct the bad driver tunings.
I just saw Crin's measurements, it's another odd tuning. Or lack there of.
The cipher doesn't fully fix it but its far better than stock
Last edited:
SilverEars
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2013
- Posts
- 15,798
- Likes
- 7,302
Well, yes. LCD-i4 was actually worse than their full-sized LCD series in terms of upper-mids. The one I measured was just beyond repair in terms of the tuning. You couldn't fix that with EQ. So, this one isn't comparatively worse tonally than the $2.4k disappointment (yes, I remember the huge prices on disappointments). No EQ with gigantic upper-mids applied in this case, that really didn't do anything. The driver does put out energy up top, which is a start.Looks much better than its predecessors to me, that huge treble void leaves a lot to be desired though.
Last edited:
davidmolliere
Headphoneus Supremus
Now this is interesting!
Sub'ed
Sub'ed
Neat. I like the ergonomic design. It looks easy on the ear lobes.
headfonics review is already up - https://headfonics.com/audeze-euclid-review/
I may be the odd one out here but I actually thought the LCD-i4 sounded amazing so much so that I went on to buy the LCD4Z.
I did use Reveal and I did prefer it over the stock tuning, however I had no real issues with the stock tuning as to me the differences were fairly subtle.
The only reason I ended up parting company with the LCD-i4 was more about case use. It wasn't really an IEM for commuting or even taking somewhere on holiday with me so it spent most if its life with my desk top set up. Again it was great for those times when no-one was around and the house was quiet so I could fully appreciate its beautiful sound but unfortunately those times were all too limited for me.
The LCD-i4 along with the Sony IER-Z1R are my all time favourite IEM's
*I did also find the ear hooks a bit of a pain and had several break on me. They were also kinda pricey to replace and difficult to get hold of in the UK
Seeing the launch of this new closed back design from Audeze has definitely peaked my interest. I would have liked to see a retail of around £999 as that's kind of my personal sweet spot for IEM's, although I would probably stretch to the £1249 asking price here in the UK if future reviews suggest they may be worth investment.
The review on headphonics is very encouraging, however it does come across a little "gushing" so I think I will wait for a few more before deciding to push the button.
Side note. I do enjoy Headphonics reviews but the ad popups on their site are really irritating and are a very unwanted distraction and definitely not user friendly. Great site and source of information otherwise.
I did use Reveal and I did prefer it over the stock tuning, however I had no real issues with the stock tuning as to me the differences were fairly subtle.
The only reason I ended up parting company with the LCD-i4 was more about case use. It wasn't really an IEM for commuting or even taking somewhere on holiday with me so it spent most if its life with my desk top set up. Again it was great for those times when no-one was around and the house was quiet so I could fully appreciate its beautiful sound but unfortunately those times were all too limited for me.
The LCD-i4 along with the Sony IER-Z1R are my all time favourite IEM's
*I did also find the ear hooks a bit of a pain and had several break on me. They were also kinda pricey to replace and difficult to get hold of in the UK
Seeing the launch of this new closed back design from Audeze has definitely peaked my interest. I would have liked to see a retail of around £999 as that's kind of my personal sweet spot for IEM's, although I would probably stretch to the £1249 asking price here in the UK if future reviews suggest they may be worth investment.
The review on headphonics is very encouraging, however it does come across a little "gushing" so I think I will wait for a few more before deciding to push the button.
Side note. I do enjoy Headphonics reviews but the ad popups on their site are really irritating and are a very unwanted distraction and definitely not user friendly. Great site and source of information otherwise.
riverground
Headphoneus Supremus
As I keep looking at pictures of the Euclid, the image of the Stax SR-003MkII (with the CES-A1 closed back covers oncomes to mind a bit.
I never got to try the Stax but would be curious to hear how these two sound against each other. EST vs Planar

I never got to try the Stax but would be curious to hear how these two sound against each other. EST vs Planar

That looks.......strange to say the least.As I keep looking at pictures of the Euclid, the image of the Stax SR-003MkII (with the CES-A1 closed back covers oncomes to mind a bit.
I never got to try the Stax but would be curious to hear how these two sound against each other. EST vs Planar![]()
riverground
Headphoneus Supremus
It does, doesn’t it? LolThat looks.......strange to say the least.
I remember stumbling upon these a while back in a Lachlanlikesathing (@a_recording) video.
Last edited:
Why my wallet is empty? Whyyyyyyy?
@Audeze which is the size of comply foam? 400?
@Audeze which is the size of comply foam? 400?
Last edited:
They should work well with something like Lotoo Paw S1 and L&P W2 and Netflix
.
AlwaysForward
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2017
- Posts
- 1,549
- Likes
- 1,205
No cipher?!? I’m sad.
Users who are viewing this thread
Total: 6 (members: 0, guests: 6)