donunus
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2004
- Posts
- 9,258
- Likes
- 168
Actually, I would like to quote kool bubba ice since so many people rebelled against his first impressions of these cans.
Quote:
This is almost spot on with what I hear with my brand new pair that I got just now. Now I say almost because for $100 this is hard to beat. In fact, these already sound better than the k701s IMO although not as technically good when it comes to bass detail for example.
These ad700s remind me most of my ad2000s with better soundstage and highs but with less impact. The mids are a little recessed in some frequencies just like the ad2ks but dont have the hardcore extreme boosts in other frequencies like the ad2k does at the same time. comfort is very good but correct ear placement is a must for obtaining the best sound. This is probably because of the angled drivers.
I'll post more impressions later after burn in but for 104 dollars brand new, these are very very awesome even listening out of the box............................................... .................................................. ...................
EDIT: I'm adding some of the posts I've made within the first 6 pages of this thread to give more substance to this first post
Here it is...
I would like to add that my first impressions above were done straight out of an ipod touch 2g playing vbr mp3s with no eq.
Now I'm listening to them with my Mhdt Havana dac using western electric tubes and amped with a glite with dps playing a cd of katherine Jenkins. These cans are blowing my mind in bliss with this music and equipment combo. I'll try other music later but the word for now is....
sparkly, airy, great soundstage with a warm overall sound despite the slight bass leaness. It is the recession in this one portion of the upper mids/low treble that make the AD700s and ad2000s warm sounding IMO. I cant pinpoint the frequency but i feel its a lower treble area recession opposite of the k701s lower treble boost that make these sound warm. Did I mention top end sparkle??? I havent heard this much sparkle in other audiophile headphones
I'd like to add that i did some comparisons of the ad700s between my hd600s and sr60s earlier using 3 pad configurations( flats, bowls, reversed bowls) and the grados sounded like a toy compared to both the ad700 and the hd600 which clearly sounded like more expensive headphones. Now, when it comes to the 2(hd600 and ad700), some music actually sounds better on the ad700s because of the clear highs and not overly warm lower mids. Only when playing semi bass shy 80s recordings does the hd600s excel so far. Theres is a slight plasticky tone to the ad700 compared to the more damped and controlled hd600 but its not such a big deal really. I have to try more complex music tomorrow to see how the ad700s perform because as of now, I'm impressed. I actually prefer these to the more expensive AD2000 regardless of whether they were the same price.... so far...
I would also like to say that I just read the stereophile comments made by Sam Tellig on Sams space June 2008 comparing k701s with the ad700s. I don't agree with him saying the k701 is more extended in highs. Well he did say he wasn't that extended himself either. The k701s are brighter but more rolled off on top IMO. The ad700s like I said in my impressions have a relatively warm sound against the k701s because the lower highs are not emphasized like the k701s. The emphasis of the ad700 is above 10khz which is great for my tastes. They make cymbals shimmer but dont change their timbre like the k701s do.
heres the article...
Stereophile | Jun-08 | Inside | Zinio Digital Magazines
I just got back from a concert just now with a string quartet with a piano player, an oboe, flute, and guitar and I was sitting dead center in the third row where i was about maybe 15 feet away from the nearest musician on stage. After this i was curious to see if the hd600 would sound closer to what I heard than the ad700s while listening to a cd from the tempera quartet... Guess what... with my setup, the ad700 blows the hd600 away with this music. The ad700s sound much more like what I heard in the concert. It is still slightly sharper and more hollow than the real thing though but then again I'm listening to a recording on a $100 can!!!!!! The western electric tube on my dac does help a big ways towards getting that realistic soft touch and body to the real instruments when compared with my cheap solid state sources.
Disclaimer: Think of this as a fanatic raving thread because i struck gold so to say. Please don't get tempted to buy the ad700s because I love them so much. Get them if you like the descriptions I made about them. If I put myself in others shoes, they are really not that impressive. They just happened to strike a chord in me that hasn't been touched in years. Mysterious shyte coming from such a cheap can.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kool bubba ice /img/forum/go_quote.gif Music Pros good clarity, especially in the higher frequencies. Remarkable front to back depth. Sound stage as a whole is big. Nice imaging. Cons recessed mids. Not bad, but noticeable. Bass is delicate and lacks authority. Sound seems un natural to me. Sound stage is not very coherent. A lot of smearing. Lacks good detail retrieval |
This is almost spot on with what I hear with my brand new pair that I got just now. Now I say almost because for $100 this is hard to beat. In fact, these already sound better than the k701s IMO although not as technically good when it comes to bass detail for example.
These ad700s remind me most of my ad2000s with better soundstage and highs but with less impact. The mids are a little recessed in some frequencies just like the ad2ks but dont have the hardcore extreme boosts in other frequencies like the ad2k does at the same time. comfort is very good but correct ear placement is a must for obtaining the best sound. This is probably because of the angled drivers.
I'll post more impressions later after burn in but for 104 dollars brand new, these are very very awesome even listening out of the box............................................... .................................................. ...................
EDIT: I'm adding some of the posts I've made within the first 6 pages of this thread to give more substance to this first post
Here it is...
I would like to add that my first impressions above were done straight out of an ipod touch 2g playing vbr mp3s with no eq.
Now I'm listening to them with my Mhdt Havana dac using western electric tubes and amped with a glite with dps playing a cd of katherine Jenkins. These cans are blowing my mind in bliss with this music and equipment combo. I'll try other music later but the word for now is....
sparkly, airy, great soundstage with a warm overall sound despite the slight bass leaness. It is the recession in this one portion of the upper mids/low treble that make the AD700s and ad2000s warm sounding IMO. I cant pinpoint the frequency but i feel its a lower treble area recession opposite of the k701s lower treble boost that make these sound warm. Did I mention top end sparkle??? I havent heard this much sparkle in other audiophile headphones
I'd like to add that i did some comparisons of the ad700s between my hd600s and sr60s earlier using 3 pad configurations( flats, bowls, reversed bowls) and the grados sounded like a toy compared to both the ad700 and the hd600 which clearly sounded like more expensive headphones. Now, when it comes to the 2(hd600 and ad700), some music actually sounds better on the ad700s because of the clear highs and not overly warm lower mids. Only when playing semi bass shy 80s recordings does the hd600s excel so far. Theres is a slight plasticky tone to the ad700 compared to the more damped and controlled hd600 but its not such a big deal really. I have to try more complex music tomorrow to see how the ad700s perform because as of now, I'm impressed. I actually prefer these to the more expensive AD2000 regardless of whether they were the same price.... so far...
I would also like to say that I just read the stereophile comments made by Sam Tellig on Sams space June 2008 comparing k701s with the ad700s. I don't agree with him saying the k701 is more extended in highs. Well he did say he wasn't that extended himself either. The k701s are brighter but more rolled off on top IMO. The ad700s like I said in my impressions have a relatively warm sound against the k701s because the lower highs are not emphasized like the k701s. The emphasis of the ad700 is above 10khz which is great for my tastes. They make cymbals shimmer but dont change their timbre like the k701s do.
heres the article...
Stereophile | Jun-08 | Inside | Zinio Digital Magazines
I just got back from a concert just now with a string quartet with a piano player, an oboe, flute, and guitar and I was sitting dead center in the third row where i was about maybe 15 feet away from the nearest musician on stage. After this i was curious to see if the hd600 would sound closer to what I heard than the ad700s while listening to a cd from the tempera quartet... Guess what... with my setup, the ad700 blows the hd600 away with this music. The ad700s sound much more like what I heard in the concert. It is still slightly sharper and more hollow than the real thing though but then again I'm listening to a recording on a $100 can!!!!!! The western electric tube on my dac does help a big ways towards getting that realistic soft touch and body to the real instruments when compared with my cheap solid state sources.
Disclaimer: Think of this as a fanatic raving thread because i struck gold so to say. Please don't get tempted to buy the ad700s because I love them so much. Get them if you like the descriptions I made about them. If I put myself in others shoes, they are really not that impressive. They just happened to strike a chord in me that hasn't been touched in years. Mysterious shyte coming from such a cheap can.