Quote:
@aleki, now that we've all heard of them would it be fair to 1964 to rename the title of this thread
"1964 Ears (The Appreciation Thread)"?
Quote:
+1 can't agree with @SoulSyde more. hahaha
really sorry guys. I've been a bit busy lately and havent had much time to sit down, read the 15 odd pages of new content, and make alterations to the OP. I'll gladly change the title, however, the OP alterations may not come 'till next week. I plan to make this the "root of the tree" thread, where I will be trying my best to keep up with links from independent reviews, and perhaps a little picture preview before the links(that is, if the contributing members dont mind)
Quote:
Okay, I'm running into some technical problems with photos, some other assignments and some additional information I want to include, but I'm still shooting for getting the quad review posted this week (or early next week at the latest).
To add a new wrinkle to the 1964-Q (I hope those members who know me are sitting down for this), I have so madly fallen in love with the quads that I have done something I thought I would never do>>> I put the JVC FX700 up for sale. I know I know. The 1964-Q has just managed to hit the all-time sound signature I desire in voicing, instrument separation, detail and soundstage that I rarely want to listen to anything else. I mainly keep the SM2 and the Panny HJE900 in my ears while commuting. As soon as I get home, however, everything else comes quickly out and the quads are escorted into my ear canals. Again, I will never say there's nothing out there that sounds better than the 1964-Q (I'm sure there is), but I haven't heard it yet. I'm quite satisfied.
Eric, I am very enthused to hear how much you like them. You have me 100% convinced on the quads. I'll be looking to join you guys sometime this february; right after I sell my brand new replacement MD's