Quote:
Ha ha ha, look, I think this may help.
http://www.eng.auburn.edu/users/crockmj/Fastl_acta_acustica.pdf
Just run a 'quick test' like this for each of the headphones you need clarification on and you should have your objective answer.
I look forward to your results and you can also determine $/SQ ratio, you seem intent on knowing, that we cant provide for you as we just use our ears!
Can't wait.....
lol... love the effort, but that study is not well done as it does not describe why certain sounds are better than others. It simply observes how we can measure the differences variations of sound due to different frequency emphasis and how the different factors are interdependent. Not really ground-breaking results. It's also about trying to reduce the annoyance of industrial background noise from objects such as motorcycles, saws, and broadband tones. So basically completely unrelated.
To study whether people are biased by price or branding, you can do a very simple experiment where you take two identical headphones but tell one group that they are priced at differently/from different brands or tell one group they are priced the same/from the same brand, and give everyone a survey to fill out about the sound quality.
lol. Honestly, determining if the money spent is worth the sound quality is very easy. You simply see what else you can purchase at that price point and what are the particular headphone's main competitors. If there is a significant jump in price between headphones that are in the same class with similar sonic attributes, then that product is probably overpriced. If you can get something that is considerably more advanced at that price, then the product you are looking at is overpriced. Of course, if you find a particular sound signature extremely attractive, you probably don't care as much for the price, but that doesn't mean that it is a good value for someone else.
Yes, you should use your ears, but you should also realize that your brain is the thing that is judging the sound quality and the brain is very easily swayed by very silly random things. Also, I feel like it is very important to be able to translate what you are hearing into an objective description that can be duplicated by others and is reflected by objective tests such as a headphone frequency response chart. Head-fi does not really take that approach, but seems to be mostly compromised of people's opinions... so I guess you really can only go with what opinions reoccur a lot (the group consensus). Since there really is no standard of measurement for headphones, the only way to accurately describe how they sound like is through comparisons.
Ideally, it would be nice to see more headphone comparisons that list specific songs (bitrate) and the time in the song that you can hear the sonic differences between the two headphones. Example: V-Moda M100 vs Sony MDR-1R: test song: Hotel California 320kpbs. from 1:00-1:30, On the M100, the bassline is more forward while the vocals and guitars are a bit recessed. On the MDR-1R, the vocals are more emphasized. ...etc..
That is really all I am looking for. Someone to compare the Pro 500 with another one of its competitors in the $300 range and tell me specifically why it is supposed to sound better. Didn't really seem that complicated of a request for a bunch of audiophiles, but the answers I get are: stop trolling, of course they are worth it, the sound quality is better, random insult, just go listen for yourself.