scrane
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2008
- Posts
- 360
- Likes
- 67
Quote:
The um3 might be what you're looking for. They are well formed and tuck tightly in the loop of my ear. Cables are not noisy over the ear. I don't know about wind noise, but isolation is good and the SQ is kind of penetrating to my ears (in a good way). They are moderately priced. Sound is balanced so should be pleasant when you're stationary.
I know you've been asking around about the ie8 also. They are a fine sounding earphone, but because of their open back dynamic driver I suspect there will be a lot of wind noise.
Originally Posted by turnstyle /img/forum/go_quote.gif The UM3x doesn't have a ridge on the stem that holds the tips, right? Can you slide your tips a bit further out on the stem to get a better fit? And thanks -- I'd be very happy to hear from anybody here who wants to share their thoughts on the UM3x with respect to comfort, micorphonics, and wind noise -- especially helpful if you can possibly compare it to the Image S4. It would also be great if you can possibly help compare the UM3x to other high-end universal IEMs with respect to comfort, micorphonics, and wind noise -- ie, setting aside the "my preferred signature" type questions, and more about the physical attributes. |
The um3 might be what you're looking for. They are well formed and tuck tightly in the loop of my ear. Cables are not noisy over the ear. I don't know about wind noise, but isolation is good and the SQ is kind of penetrating to my ears (in a good way). They are moderately priced. Sound is balanced so should be pleasant when you're stationary.
I know you've been asking around about the ie8 also. They are a fine sounding earphone, but because of their open back dynamic driver I suspect there will be a lot of wind noise.