Can you prove that the info you got ("insinuation" from Bob, he pulling out for the reasons cited, and all of the stuff with supposedly "things going wrong with assembly/delivery", and all that about the certain "board of directors"
and "bad decisions") is "anything concrete",
before calling out other people's known and corroborated info (some of it or a lot of it exists in written documents) the way you do ? With all the money stolen from the customers, all false promises, delays, etc. - and all the evidence piling up and showing that Bob, Dan, and all of them were at it all along, and everything was conceived and planned from the beginning, what else do you need ?
Why would anyone submit proof to (especially) you, if this has gone this far and might be a legal matter ?
Have you seen and read all the comments beneath the youtube video (if you go at that youtube page)?
It is still quite ok on your behalf to write posts like this one, even after reading the numerous comments under that video on yt, some of them even heavier in content that the already heavy video itself ?
Wow, such frustration and anger in such a short point. Let me go through all these points one by one...
First and foremost, these are MY impressions, MY view of things based on the info I read over time. If you have another point, how about just giving me that info instead of trying to demolish an opinion? We'll both save ourselves some time and energy.
Insituation about Bob pulling out for reasons cited, I can't corroborate, but it does seem like the more plausible course in MY mind.
The things gone wrong with assembly/delivery, I don't even know why you challenge this: Case in point: Hunters and their titanium shell debacle. The PM6 changing materials along the way. The Airs not working. The airs being cancelled for shipment. The PM6 being cancelled for shipment. This is all known and documented in this thread.
Boad of directors is an assumption, as that's usually how a subsidiary business works (Trinity being a subsidiary of Rockjaw)
Bad decisions: Company's dead, isn't it? They overpromised and underdelivered, didn't they? Yeah, bad decisions.
There's a lot of info circulating, some fabricated, some concrete. Lots of emotions due to lost money, so I honestly can't vouch for either speeches fully. I can however make an opiniated guess based on what was presented to me.
As for proof submitted to me, during this whole ordeal, people contacted ME directly saying they had evidence, but they would not release it. I am basing myself on this when I say what I say.
Basically what's happening here is a lot of people are pissed about the situation and are looking for someone to hate. Should it be Joe Watts? Should it be Bob? Should it be Marie Timms? Who knows. All I know is that logically, you attack the entity, but noone has yet. Why is that?
And of course I didn't go through all the posts on the video, there's a lot of content, most of it doesn't give any actual proof of what happened. There are some though that state similar OPINIONS to what I have. The one from James Miller for example...
If people want to burn Bob at the stake, go right ahead. No sweat. I know a lot of people are angry about his involvement... But I still have, based on my impressions during this whole situation, the impression that some other people should be looked into.
In short: This is my OPINION based on the info I've read/seen/was corroborated. I took a position. It's different than yours. End of story.