tomjonesrocks
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2006
- Posts
- 434
- Likes
- 0
Quote:
Now that JeffS has said UM1s "UM1 desprately needs an amp" that could write off UM1s for me. I'm just not a "portable amp for my ipod" type of guy. If a IEM (which I'll be using ONLY for travel) needs an amp to sound good--it's out. I'll never use these things at home with my Headfive nor will I buy/be willing to lug a Tomahawk through airport security and whatnot--so it sounds like the UM1 would be a bad call for me.
So I'm not sure where that leaves me in terms of finding a comfortable, low-impedence, good sounding, mid-cost, isolating for-travel IEM. Sounds like the ER4p doesn't sound as good as the ER4s (which needs an amp--and both these are supposedly delicate and microphonic anyway) and the UEs are supposedly uncomfortable and fiddly which is exactly what I hated about E2c's. Vibes and JVC 220s don't isolate. Sheesh!
That's a pretty disappointing post to read--thought UM1s might be the answer I was looking for. Maybe I need to start a new thread outside this one to gather more opinions.
BTW, I have EP630s (the same housing as CX300) and the isolation isn't anything to write home about. Isolation from canalphones in general is merely average. From looking at the photo of the JVC 220s (far superior to CX300 from the posts here) I'd guess they isolate just as well as the CX300s/EP630--but who knows.
Originally Posted by BrentRS /img/forum/go_quote.gif I'm curious to see these compared too. I got the Vibes for the gym and absolutely love them, but now want something with more isolation for work/travel. I'm trying to decide between the UM1s and the Sennheiser CX300s. |
Now that JeffS has said UM1s "UM1 desprately needs an amp" that could write off UM1s for me. I'm just not a "portable amp for my ipod" type of guy. If a IEM (which I'll be using ONLY for travel) needs an amp to sound good--it's out. I'll never use these things at home with my Headfive nor will I buy/be willing to lug a Tomahawk through airport security and whatnot--so it sounds like the UM1 would be a bad call for me.
So I'm not sure where that leaves me in terms of finding a comfortable, low-impedence, good sounding, mid-cost, isolating for-travel IEM. Sounds like the ER4p doesn't sound as good as the ER4s (which needs an amp--and both these are supposedly delicate and microphonic anyway) and the UEs are supposedly uncomfortable and fiddly which is exactly what I hated about E2c's. Vibes and JVC 220s don't isolate. Sheesh!
That's a pretty disappointing post to read--thought UM1s might be the answer I was looking for. Maybe I need to start a new thread outside this one to gather more opinions.
BTW, I have EP630s (the same housing as CX300) and the isolation isn't anything to write home about. Isolation from canalphones in general is merely average. From looking at the photo of the JVC 220s (far superior to CX300 from the posts here) I'd guess they isolate just as well as the CX300s/EP630--but who knows.